Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Haddock Stanton Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$399kEducation$294kPublic Benefit$260kEnvironment$207kArts & Culture$126kPublic Safety & Disaster$120kHealth$107kPhilanthropy$92kOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k38 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS$50,000
VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER$20,000
AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$20,000
UNICEF USA$10,500
DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,500
GIVE WELL$10,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$10,000
OXFAM-AMERICA INC$10,000
DIRECT RELIEF$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$10,000
AMERICARES$10,000
THE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC$10,000
VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY$10,000
ONE ACRE FUND$5,000
T GEN FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $25k → 14%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 54 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

54 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
23

Total granted

$1.3M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+4%

Still filing today

78%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +72%
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    3× · 2018–2024 · $170k · revenue +120%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +4%
  • AC
    ARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN PUBLIC INTEREST
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
10
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
11
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Rosies House a Music Academy for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Arts CentersIndependent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community College Foundatio…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Local History MuseumsEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/63
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,502

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/61
Grantees still filing
44/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $105,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES US…INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS — $75,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF …WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $55,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $50,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNIC…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCONE ACRE FUND — $35,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDDIRECT RELIEF — $30,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF+3 more — $24,500 · International+3 moreVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT — $70,000 · OtherVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECTCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $55,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientT GEN FOUNDATION — $36,000 · OtherT GEN FOUNDATIONTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOU…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PR…+48 more — $171,030 · Other+48 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $228,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUST…AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $16,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFO…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $10,000 · Education+6 more — $31,750 · Education+6 moreDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $204,500 · EnvironmentDESERT BOTANI…+2 more — $2,000 · EnvironmentTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $170,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER P…ARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $10,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA CEN…+1 more — $5,000 · Civil RightsVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY — $80,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUND — $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION — $12,000 · PhilanthropyRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $750 · PhilanthropyMAYO CLINIC — $53,000 · HealthBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $32,000 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY INC — $9,500 · HealthVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $3,500 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · Health
International$420,000Other$437,030Education$286,250Environment$206,500Civil Rights$185,000Philanthropy$127,750Health$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $228,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $204,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $170,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $53,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $50,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE ACRE FUND — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $11,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY INC — $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDSPLAY INC — $8,100 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc — $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY — $5,350 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTORM KING ART CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOTEORG — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiterary and Prologue Society of the Southwest — $4,680 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetAFS-USA INC — $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IRISH REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANYINC — $4,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $3,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX ART MUSEUM — $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Theatre Company — $2,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Virginia G Piper Char…Jewish Community Foun…The Ottosen Family Fo…The Herberger Foundat…The Kemper & Ethel Ma…Margaret T Morris Fou…The Diane and Bruce H…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jewish Community Fede…The Yelp FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ25.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · The Ottosen Family Foundation · The Herberger Foundation · The Kemper & Ethel Marley Fdn · Margaret T Morris Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Yelp Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Haddock Stanton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines