Skip to content
The Hadassah Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Hadassah Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to improve the status, health and well being of women and girls in israel and the united states.

$540k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$643kHuman Services$215kEducation$205kYouth Development$136kReligion$130kArts & Culture$100kPhilanthropy$98kCrime & Legal$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $250,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $540,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $290,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$30,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Friends of Bar Ilan University$47,500
BELOVED BUILDERS INC$30,000
jGirls Magazine - FJC Fiscal Sponsor$30,000
Fuente Latina Inc$30,000
Moving Traditions$30,000
Jewish Women International$30,000
Yeshivat Maharat$30,000
The Jewish Women's Foundation of NY$22,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BELOVED BUILDERS INC: $30k → 12%SHALOM TASKFORCE: $30k → 17%Jewish Community Center of St Louis: $25k → 11%BELOVED BUILDERS INC: $30k → 12%SHALOM TASK FOECE: $15k → 17%SHALOM TASKFORCE: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $270k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$270k · 100% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL PURPOSES

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$986k · 10 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$986k
$460k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY IN ISRAEL INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +34%
  • MT
    MOVING TRADITIONS
    5× · 2018–2024 · $136k · revenue +65%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $100k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • HM
    HADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $388k · revenue +56%
  • HT
    Hadassah The Women's Zionist Org of America Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $36k · revenue +7%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
4
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
5
70 Faces Media Inc

70 faces media serves as the digital connective tissue of the jewish community, meeting people where they are and providing them pathways to deepen knowledge, connection, belonging and meaning.

Arts & Culture
6
Wexner Foundation
—
7
J Leaders

Our vision is to develop ethical, impactful Jewish young adult leaders to ensure a vibrant Jewish community and make the world a better place. Our mission is to empower and engage Jewish young adults through leadership development and…

Youth Development
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
Core Inc

Core inspires, develops and supports women who are jewish communal pillars by providing them resources such as professional development, training programs, expert assistance, and networking platforms.

Religion
11
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Jewish Center for Justice

Founded in 2017, the Jewish Center for Justice (JCJ) is a distinguished social justice, education, and leadership development platform that meets each individual where they are in their journey to inspire change. JCJ's mission is to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elluminate Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fuente Latina Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION INC: $387,962 · InternationalHADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF ASSOCIAT…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC: $60,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH IN…Fuente Latina Inc: $30,000 · InternationalFuente Latina IncBAR ILAN UNIVERSITY IN ISRAEL INC: $204,500 · OtherBAR ILAN UNIVERSITY IN ISRAEL INCJewish Women International: $165,000 · OtherJewish Women InternationalELLUMINATE INC: $22,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHI…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $25,000 · OtherHadassah The Women's Zionist Org of America Inc: $36,000 · OtherHadassah The Women's Zionist Org of A…EDITH & CARL MARKS JEWISH COMMUNITY HOUSE BENSONHURST INC: $30,000 · OtherEDITH & CARL MARKS JEWISH COMMUNITY H…+1 more: $11,500 · OtherSHALOM TASK FORCE INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesSHALOM TASK …BELOVED BUILDERS INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesBELOVED BUIL…Jewish Community Centers of Chicago: $40,000 · Human ServicesJewish Commu…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $25,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMU…MOVING TRADITIONS: $136,000 · ReligionMOVING TR…YESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $130,000 · EducationTHE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureFJC: $80,000 · Crime & Legal
International$477,962Other$545,000Human Services$185,000Religion$136,000Education$130,000Arts & Culture$100,000Crime & Legal$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION INC: $387,962 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBAR ILAN UNIVERSITY IN ISRAEL INC: $204,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Women International: $165,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetMOVING TRADITIONS: $136,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $130,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetFJC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHALOM TASK FORCE INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetBELOVED BUILDERS INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHadassah The Women's Zionist Org of America Inc: $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFuente Latina Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEDITH & CARL MARKS JEWISH COMMUNITY HOUSE BENSONHURST INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELLUMINATE INC: $22,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHALLAH FOR HUNGER: $11,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundUnited Jewish Appeal-…Jewish Federation of …Jewish Community Fede…New Venture FundCovenant FoundationJewish Community Foun…Jewish Federation of …FjcNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…
Jewish Communal FundNY19.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · New Venture Fund · Covenant Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Fjc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hadassah Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hadassah Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hadassah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home