Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hacker Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Religion$18kEducation$12kArts & Culture$12kHealth$4kHuman Services$3kEnvironment$3kRecreation & Sports$2kEmployment$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$244k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$2,500
EKU FOUNDATION$2,500
HOSPICE COMPASSIONATE CARE CENTER$1,000
COMMONWEATH FUND -KET$1,000
OPERA LEX$500
LWC CLOTHE-A-CHILD PROGRAM$500
Individual grant recipient$500
PAPAL MISSIONARY OF MERCY$500
LEX ART'S FUND FOR THE ARTS$500
LOUISVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION$500
MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDENS$500
MADISON CO SPORTS HALL OF FAME$500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT FOR BLUEGRASS$320
HOPE'S WINGS INC$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPES WINGS: $600 → 16%HOPES WINGS: $500 → 16%HOPE'S WINGS INC: $250 → 16%HOPE'S WINGS INC: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44k · 14 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$44k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+36%

Still filing today

29%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationInternationalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $17k
  • EF
    EKU FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $10k
  • CF
    COMMONWEATH FUND -KET
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k

Funded once

  • EK
    EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • K
    KET
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • UO
    UK OPERA THEATER
    one grant, 2021 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lexington Art League Inc

The organization promotes the visual arts in the central kentucky area through sponsorshps of exhibits, offering classes, art fairs, and similar endeavors.

Arts & Culture
2
Commerce Lexington Inc

To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.

3
Lexington Children's Theatre Inc

To provide professional theatre experiences for young audiences. to provide quality theatre education for young people annually. lct provides quality theatre experiences and theatre arts education for as many as 150,000 children throughout…

Arts & Culture
4
Actors Theatre of Louisville Inc

Actors theatre unlocks human potential, builds community and enriches quality of life by engaging people in theatre that reflects the wonder and complexity of our time.

Arts & Culture
5
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
6
Lexington Public Library

Our mission is to enrich and connect our community through welcoming spaces, engaged staff, diverse resources, and lifelong learning opportunities. we create a stronger community by meeting our customers where and how they need us and…

Education
7
Ballet Theatre of Lexington Inc

Promoting interest in ballet, maintaining a professional dance company, and operating a dance school.

Arts & Culture
8
Kentucky Public Radio Inc

Lpm provides independent and courageous news, music and experiences that serve the needs and aspirations of our diverse communities.

Arts & Culture
9
Louisville Theatrical Association Inc

Advance the arts through education and enabling the public, generally, to enjoy musical,dramatic, operatic, and other forms of entertainment, to as great an extent as possible and at as low a cost as possible. produce and present…

Arts & Culture
10
Studio Players Inc

Studio Players Inc. is a non-profit community theatre in Lexington KY. Incorporated in 1952 the organizations mission is to provide the greater Lexington KY area with a wide array of live theatre production that will be enjoyed by a wide…

11
Louisville Academy of Music

The louisville academy of music welcomes everyone to join our musical community. lam nurtures lifelong learners, not solely as musicians but also as creative, inspired people. equity in music education is a force to realize potential,…

Arts & Culture
12
Knoxville Opera Company

Performance of opera and musicals

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lexarts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hopes Wings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $17,000 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHEKU FOUNDATION — $9,500 · OtherEKU FOUNDATIONCOMMONWEATH FUND -KET — $4,000 · OtherCOMMONWEATH FUND -KETMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDENS — $2,000 · OtherEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · OtherHOSPICE COMPASSIONATE CARE CENTER — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,700 · Other+18 more — $9,570 · Other+18 moreLEXARTS INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureOPERALEX INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureFUND FOR THE ARTS INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureLEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY — $150 · Arts & CultureHopes Wings Inc — $1,450 · Human ServicesMAYO CLINIC — $1,000 · HealthGREATER LOUISVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $500 · EnvironmentMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE — $350 · Education
Other$47,770Arts & Culture$3,150Human Services$1,450Health$1,000Recreation & Sports$500Environment$500Education$350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHopes Wings Inc — $1,450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEXARTS INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERALEX INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFUND FOR THE ARTS INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LOUISVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hopes Wings Inc
  • Who funds LEXARTS INC
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds OPERALEX INC
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds GREATER LOUISVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION INC
  • Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of the Bluegrass Inc
  • Who funds JUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC
  • Who funds LEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

LG&E and Ku Foundation IncKY19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hacker Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hacker Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Hacker Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph