Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Guerra Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$45kReligion$42kEnvironment$20kPhilanthropy$19kHealth$9kHousing & Shelter$7kYouth Development$6kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GESU CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
ST BRENDAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC$5,000
BREAKTHROUGH$2,000
AMIGOS TOGETHER FOR KIDS INC$2,000
CASA VALENTINA INC$2,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
CASA FAMILIA INC$1,000
CITIZENS FOR A BETTER SOUTH FLORIDA INC$1,000
LEAP OF JOY$1,000
PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS INC$1,000
CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC$1,000
BETTER ATX$1,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE INC$1,000
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC$1,000
AUSTIN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REBUILDING TOGETHER MIAMI-DADE INC: $1k → 15%CENTRO MATER FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $1k → 15%DORAL PRO HEALTH CORP: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$93k · 8 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$93k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+10%

Still filing today

75%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GESU CATHOLIC CHURCH
    8× · 2017–2025 · $39k
  • FF
    FRANCISCO FOUNDATION INC THE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $18k
  • TA
    THE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $16k · revenue -66%

Funded once

  • MD
    MIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC New World Schoo
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MD
    MIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -19%
  • CR
    CRISTO REY MIAMI HIGH SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +394%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami
—
2
Central Miami Intergroup
—
3
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
6
Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment
7
South Miami Childrens Clinic Inc

Pediatric medical clinic for uninsured and underinsured children

Health
8
Families First of Palm Beach County Foundation Inc

To cultivate financial resources dedicated to building stronger families and stronger communities through the operations and programs of families first. contributing to the foundation is an investment in a safe, healthy and sustainable…

Human Services
9
Children's Diagnostic & Treatment Center Inc

To promote the optimal health and wellbeing of children and youth with special health care needs by providing family centered, comprehensive prevention, intervention and treatment services within a medical home environment. our vision is…

Health
10
Miami Bridge Youth and Family Services Inc

Provide crisis intervention for youths.

—
11
Centro Campesino Farmworker Center Inc

Centro campesino farmworker center, inc. empowers families and strengthens communities by providing affordable housing, homeownership support and economic and educational opportunities. we envision a thriving community that leverages…

Housing & Shelter
12
Ywca South Florida Inc

Provide services and programs for women, teens, children, and families of miami-dade county in focusing our mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Breakthrough Miami Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leap of Joy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Healthcare Networ…Senior Residential CareAustin Community DevelopmentYouth Support and Skills De…International Child & Commu…Organizational Development …Regional Business ChambersSouth Florida Community Dev…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%0%<5yr16%3%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr15%36%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr10%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%0%<5yr16%6%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr15%34%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr10%21%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
16%
3,378/21,274

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
13/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GESU CATHOLIC CHURCH — $39,000 · OtherGESU CATHOLIC CHURCHFRANCISCO FOUNDATION INC THE — $17,500 · OtherFRANCISCO FOUNDATION INC THEMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC New World Schoo — $10,000 · OtherMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC New World SchooST BRENDAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC — $5,000 · OtherST BRENDAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC+15 more — $16,500 · Other+15 moreMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FO…FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · EducationFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL…CRISTO REY MIAMI HIGH SCHOOL INC — $5,000 · EducationCRISTO REY MIAMI HIGH…THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLO…BREAKTHROUGH — $2,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGHAUSTIN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $2,000 · EducationAUSTIN PUBLIC EDUCATI…+1 more — $500 · EducationTHE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC — $16,160 · Recreation & SportsTHE ALLIANC…Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc — $5,000 · HealthWILLIAMS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · HealthBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MIAMI INC — $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASA VALENTINA INC — $2,500 · Housing & ShelterCASA FAMILIA INC — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER MIAMI INC — $500 · Housing & ShelterCITIZENS FOR A BETTER SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $3,500 · Environment
Other$88,000Education$29,500Recreation & Sports$16,160Health$7,000Youth Development$5,500Housing & Shelter$4,500Environment$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC — $16,160 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY MIAMI HIGH SCHOOL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MIAMI INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS FOR A BETTER SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCASA VALENTINA INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN CUBA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMIGOS TOGETHER FOR KIDS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO MATER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAP OF JOY — $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWILLIAMS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBetter ATX — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDORAL PRO HEALTH CORP — $500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOW CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER MIAMI INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKRISTI HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation …Mightycause Charitabl…The Batchelor Foundat…Assurant FoundationPeacock Foundation IncUnited Way Miami IncCoral Gables Communit…American Express Foun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Td Charitable Foundat…Ryder System Charitab…The Kirk Foundation
The Miami Foundation IncFL31.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Assurant Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · Coral Gables Community Foundation Inc · American Express Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Ryder System Charitable Foundation Inc · The Kirk Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Guerra Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Casa Familia Inc — 53% of income from government
  • Kristi House Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Foundation for Human Rights in Cuba — 29% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
  • The Sundari Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home