· Private foundation
The Gt Render Family Foundation Co Bridges & Dunn-Rankin LLP
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RESTORATION OF POWER MINISTRIES INC | $15,000 |
| EAST LAKE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CITY OF REFUGE | $5,000 |
| CHUBB FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA | $5,000 |
| TAAL SPORTS NOP INC | $3,550 |
| COMMUNITY IMPACT | $3,000 |
| FRIENDS OF HOWARD UNIVERSITY GOLF | $3,000 |
| EVECE FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| YEARLY ANGELS INC | $3,000 |
| KRAFT FAMILY YMCA | $3,000 |
| ACTORS FUND OF AMERICA | $2,500 |
| MOVING IN THE SPIRIT | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ELEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +45%
- COCITY OF REFUGE6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +151%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC5× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- SOSEEDS OF EXCELLENCE INCone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -94%
- DCDREAM CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +55%
- DIDMF Internationl Incone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue -96%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide expert coaching from ninth grade through college graduation, and work to dismantle systemic racial and economic barriers, so that greater atlanta students are able to achieve their ambitions.
Motivating underserved urban youth to excel in their academics and character to empower them to be leaders who bring about positive changes in their schools, communities and the world.
Redefined atlanta engages communities, advocates for equity, and funds critical work to drive systemic level improvement in k-12 public education for students and families.
The bridge golf foundation is a non profit organization with a mission to use the game of golf to improve life outcomes for young men of color.
To inspire high-potential youth from risk-filled environments to pursue personal success, to prepare them for leadership roles in college, work and community, and to motivate them to become role models for others.
Boy with a ball is focused on helping local, indigenous-led organizations deepen and extend their work to help young people living in economically disadvantaged communities to rise out of poverty. boy with a ball's innovative team-based…
To use basketball as a means to educate and enrich the lives of the youth of Africa. aim to provide quality facilities, coaching and instruction while enhancing the growth of the game of basketball within Africa. strive to create a pathway…
The shaquille o'neal foundation's mission is to create pathways for underserved youth, to help them achieve their full potential. the foundation works to instill hope and bring about change in communities, collectively shaping a brighter…
Thrive Academy is a private Christian school using education as a platform to reach, disciple, and empower students facing systemic injustice, childhood trauma, and poverty. With student housing, engaging curriculum, and intentional…
Ga stars basketballs mission is to help develop the youths abilities both mentally and physically in basketball in addition to providing an avenue for physical education and physical training in the field of basketball.
As a whole every initiative that the Foundation undertakes strives to promote love, positivity, and equality to all.
InspirEdus mission is to help underserved youth develop the skills needed for education and career success through technology-based learning tools and engagement activities with their families, communities, and schools.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seeds of Excellence Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sons and Daughters of Haiti Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds CHUBB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUE COLORS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
- Who funds YEARLY ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds TEENS VOICE USA INC ↗
- Who funds SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA CELTICS INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DMF Internationl Inc ↗
- Who funds Silence the Shame Inc ↗
- Who funds Good Golfers Better People of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LUSTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of Howard University Golf ↗
- Who funds EVECE Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CREEKSIDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds SURGE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds MOVING IN THE SPIRIT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Gt Render Family Foundation Co Bridges & Dunn-Rankin LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.