Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gt Render Family Foundation Co Bridges & Dunn-Rankin LLP

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$85kRecreation & Sports$78kEducation$69kYouth Development$51kHuman Services$48kArts & Culture$48kHealth$43kInternational$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESTORATION OF POWER MINISTRIES INC$15,000
EAST LAKE FOUNDATION$10,000
CHUBB FOUNDATION INC$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$5,000
CITY OF REFUGE$5,000
TAAL SPORTS NOP INC$3,550
EVECE FOUNDATION$3,000
YEARLY ANGELS INC$3,000
KRAFT FAMILY YMCA$3,000
COMMUNITY IMPACT$3,000
FRIENDS OF HOWARD UNIVERSITY GOLF$3,000
ACTORS FUND OF AMERICA$2,500
MOVING IN THE SPIRIT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MOVING IN THE SPIRIT: $1k → 14%YEARLY ANGELS INC: $5k → 13%YEARLY ANGELS INC: $5k → 13%YEARLY ANGELS INC: $4k → 13%YEARLY ANGELS INC: $4k → 13%YEARLY ANGELS INC: $3k → 13%YEARLY ANGELS INC: $3k → 13%YEARLY ANGELS INC: $3k → 13%YEARLY ANGELS INC: $3k → 13%YEARLY ANGELS INC: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
TN
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$375k · 16 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
20

Total granted

$375k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-9%

Still filing today

44%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL
    EAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +45%
  • CO
    CITY OF REFUGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +151%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • SO
    SEEDS OF EXCELLENCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -94%
  • DC
    DREAM CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +55%
  • DI
    DMF Internationl Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
College Aim Inc

To provide expert coaching from ninth grade through college graduation, and work to dismantle systemic racial and economic barriers, so that greater atlanta students are able to achieve their ambitions.

Education
2
Elevate Your G a M E

Motivating underserved urban youth to excel in their academics and character to empower them to be leaders who bring about positive changes in their schools, communities and the world.

Youth Development
3
Every Student Every Community Inc

Redefined atlanta engages communities, advocates for equity, and funds critical work to drive systemic level improvement in k-12 public education for students and families.

Education
4
The Bridge Golf Foundation

The bridge golf foundation is a non profit organization with a mission to use the game of golf to improve life outcomes for young men of color.

Youth Development
5
C5 Youth Foundation of Georgia Inc

To inspire high-potential youth from risk-filled environments to pursue personal success, to prepare them for leadership roles in college, work and community, and to motivate them to become role models for others.

Youth Development
6
Boy With a Ball Global Inc

Boy with a ball is focused on helping local, indigenous-led organizations deepen and extend their work to help young people living in economically disadvantaged communities to rise out of poverty. boy with a ball's innovative team-based…

Religion
7
The Ujiri Foundation Inc

To use basketball as a means to educate and enrich the lives of the youth of Africa. aim to provide quality facilities, coaching and instruction while enhancing the growth of the game of basketball within Africa. strive to create a pathway…

Youth Development
8
The Shaquille O'neal Foundation

The shaquille o'neal foundation's mission is to create pathways for underserved youth, to help them achieve their full potential. the foundation works to instill hope and bring about change in communities, collectively shaping a brighter…

Youth Development
9
Thrive Academy Atlanta Inc

Thrive Academy is a private Christian school using education as a platform to reach, disciple, and empower students facing systemic injustice, childhood trauma, and poverty. With student housing, engaging curriculum, and intentional…

Education
10
Georgia Stars Basketball Inc

Ga stars basketballs mission is to help develop the youths abilities both mentally and physically in basketball in addition to providing an avenue for physical education and physical training in the field of basketball.

Youth Development
11
Renee Montgomery Foundation Inc

As a whole every initiative that the Foundation undertakes strives to promote love, positivity, and equality to all.

Youth Development
12
Inspiredu Inc

InspirEdus mission is to help underserved youth develop the skills needed for education and career success through technology-based learning tools and engagement activities with their families, communities, and schools.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seeds of Excellence Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sons and Daughters of Haiti Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/23
Grantees still filing
10/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RESTORATION OF POWER MINISTRIES INC: $42,000 · OtherRESTORATION OF POWER MINISTRIES INCTEENS VOICE USA INC: $30,000 · OtherTEENS VOICE USA INCTAAL SPORTS NOP INC: $15,550 · OtherTAAL SPORTS NOP INCSEEDS OF EXCELLENCE INC: $11,500 · OtherSEEDS OF EXCELLENCE INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDMF Internationl Inc: $7,500 · OtherKRAFT FAMILY YMCA: $6,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $12,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc+17 more: $42,450 · Other+17 moreEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $50,449 · PhilanthropyEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINCCHUBB FOUNDATION INC: $42,500 · PhilanthropyCHUBB FOUNDATION INCTHE LUSTER FOUNDATION: $4,472 · Philanthropy+1 more: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTRUE COLORS THEATRE COMPANY: $37,500 · Arts & CultureTRUE COLORS TH…SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF HAITI INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureSONS AND DAUGH…Silence the Shame Inc: $7,000 · Arts & CultureSilence the Sh…EVECE Foundation Inc: $3,000 · Arts & CultureYEARLY ANGELS INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesYEARLY ANG…DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesDREAM CENT…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCITY OF REFUGE: $36,000 · ReligionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,500 · HealthATLANTA CELTICS INC: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsGood Golfers Better People of Metro Atlanta Inc: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsFriends of Howard University Golf: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$177,500Philanthropy$100,421Arts & Culture$59,500Human Services$43,000Religion$36,000Health$30,500Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $50,449 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHUBB FOUNDATION INC: $42,500 over 8y, 14% of budgetTRUE COLORS THEATRE COMPANY: $37,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE: $36,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYEARLY ANGELS INC: $32,000 over 9y, 35% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEENS VOICE USA INC: $30,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetATLANTA CELTICS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetSONS AND DAUGHTERS OF HAITI INC: $12,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDMF Internationl Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSilence the Shame Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGood Golfers Better People of Metro Atlanta Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LUSTER FOUNDATION: $4,472 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetFriends of Howard University Golf: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCREEKSIDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSURGE INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVING IN THE SPIRIT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRON CLARK ACADEMY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds CHUBB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUE COLORS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds YEARLY ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TEENS VOICE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA CELTICS INC ↗
  • Who funds SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF EXCELLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DMF Internationl Inc ↗
  • Who funds Silence the Shame Inc ↗
  • Who funds Good Golfers Better People of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE LUSTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVECE Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Howard University Golf ↗
  • Who funds CREEKSIDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SURGE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MOVING IN THE SPIRIT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gt Render Family Foundation Co Bridges & Dunn-Rankin LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gt Render Family Foundation Co Bridges & Dunn-Rankin LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gt Render Family Foundation Co Bridges & Dunn-Rankin LLP’s filings →

    More from the funding graph