Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gristmill Foundation Co Candida Cucharo

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$72kEducation$40kArts & Culture$11kFood & Nutrition$7kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$273k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN$5,000
DIGNITY BEYOND BORDERS$5,000
NYS ASSOC FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH$5,000
INNER-CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$3,900
DANCING DREAMS$2,500
ADVENTURES IN LEARNING$2,500
ST MARY'S HEALTH CARE FOR CHILDREN$2,000
HUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN$1,500
ST JOHN'S BREAD LIFE$1,000
DOCS FOR TOTS$1,000
HARMONY PROGRAM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE VISCARDI CENTER: $5k → 6%THE VISCARDI CENTER: $5k → 6%DOCS FOR TOTS: $1k → 6%DOCS FOR TOTS: $1k → 6%DOCS FOR TOTS: $600 → 6%DOCS FOR TOTS: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 12 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$121k
$4k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • AI
    ADVENTURES IN LEARNING INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +77%
  • TV
    THE VISCARDI CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARY'S HEALTH CARE- FOR CHLDRN
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • IE
    INFANT EARLY MENTAL HEALTH PROMOTIO
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilities Inc

Abilites Inc is a non-profit agency dedicated to facilitating integrated employment and full participation of persons with disabilities in their work and living communities. Employment is accomplished through direct service to youth and…

—
2
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

—
3
St Francis Day School Inc

A private school providing an exceptional college preparatory program with a specialty in learning disabilities.

Education
4
The Vincent Smith School

The Vincent Smith School is a co-ed, independent, special education school for grades ones through twelve, serving Nassau, Suffolk, and New York City students. The School specializes in students with various learning issues.

Education
5
Children At Play Early Intervention Center

To provide each child with a unique and individualized educational, therapeutic experience which will lay the foundation for the future as a capable and productive member of their community

Education
6
The Child Study Center of New York

To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.

—
7
Resources for Children With Special Needs Inc

Includenyc fosters positive futures and enhances the quality of life for new york city children and youth with disabilities, ages birth through 26, and their families. (continued on schedule o)includenyc empowers families of children and…

Human Services
8
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
9
Acds Inc

Acds is dedicated to providing lifetime resources of exceptional quality, innovation and inclusion for individuals with down syndrome, autism and other developmental disabilities and their families. we provide a continuum of year round…

—
10
Variety Child Learning Center

Variety child learning center (vclc) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that provides programs and services that meet the individual educational, therapeutic, and social-emotional needs of children with and without disabilities.…

Education
11
Harbor Day Care Center Inc

The organization provides childcare services to children age 12 weeks to 12 years through infant/toddler, pre-k, before and after school, and summer camp programs.

—
12
Do for One Nyc

To serve people with developmental disabilities

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Alternatives for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dancing Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NYS ASSOC FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH: $35,700 · OtherNYS ASSOC FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTHINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $19,600 · OtherINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCST MARY'S HEALTH CARE FOR CHILDREN: $14,500 · OtherST MARY'S HEALTH CARE FOR CHILDRENST IGNATIUS SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS SCHOOLNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 · OtherNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INCST JOHN'S BREAD LIFE: $4,500 · Other+2 more: $3,700 · OtherTHE VISCARDI CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE VISCARD…DOCS FOR TOTS: $3,100 · Human ServicesDOCS FOR TO…DANCING DREAMS: $6,000 · Arts & CultureDANCING D…THE HARMONY PROGRAM INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HARMO…ADVENTURES IN LEARNING INC: $10,500 · EducationDIGNITY INC: $5,000 · HealthHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$89,000Human Services$13,100Arts & Culture$11,000Education$10,500Health$5,000Youth Development$3,500Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $19,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetADVENTURES IN LEARNING INC: $10,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VISCARDI CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDANCING DREAMS: $6,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARMONY PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOCS FOR TOTS: $3,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURES IN LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VISCARDI CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DANCING DREAMS ↗
  • Who funds NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds DIGNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARMONY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds DOCS FOR TOTS ↗
  • Who funds St Johns Bread & Life Program Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gristmill Foundation Co Candida Cucharo funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gristmill Foundation Co Candida Cucharo. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gristmill Foundation Co Candida Cucharo?

    Find your warmest path to The Gristmill Foundation Co Candida Cucharo through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gristmill Foundation Co Candida Cucharo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph