Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gregory Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$60kReligion$39kFood & Nutrition$14kCrime & Legal$8kPhilanthropy$8kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BB&N SCHOOL$36,000
ST ANDREWS$5,000
ST MARK'S SCHOOL$2,500
ST BARNABAS CHURCH$2,000
OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,000
BARNSTABLE CLEAN WATER COALITION$1,000
CAPE KID MEALS$1,000
FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD$1,000
GREENWICH ACADEMY$1,000
WOMEN'S JUSTICE INITIATIVE$1,000
COTOCHESET HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRUST$500
BRUNSWICK SCHOOL$500
OSTERVILLE VILLAGE LIBRARY$500
EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL$500
SQUASH HAVEN$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $500 → 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $500 → 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $500 → 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $500 → 12%SQUASH HAVEN: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130k · 20 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$130k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+52%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    CAPE KID MEALS INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +173%
  • WJ
    Womens Justice Initiative Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +111%
  • GA
    GREENWICH ACADEMY INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -24%
  • FP
    FAMILY PARTY OF CAPE COD
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • MC
    MIT COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Oliverian School Inc

Oliverian is a non-profit, alternative, college-prep boarding school for adolescents who have not thrived in traditional settings. we fill the gap between traditional and therapeutic schools, providing the right mix of support and guided…

Education
2
Cold Spring School Inc

Cold spring school challenges children to become self-reliant, curious and resourceful problem solvers with the academic and social skills to engage constructively and ethically in our diverse, changing world.

Education
3
The Village Nursery School Inc

Village nursery school provides preschool services to children between the ages of 2 and 6 years of age in harvard, massachusetts. it is the goal of village nursery school to educate children intellectually, creatively, socially,…

Education
4
Westchester Secondary Charter School

Westchester secondary charter school will provide students in grades 6-12 with a challenging and comprehensive college preparatory education in a public school setting employing the technology of the 21st century. we will inspire students…

—
5
Foxcroft School

Foxcroft's mission is to help every girl explore her unique voice and to develop the skills, confidence, and courage to share it with the world with emphasis on Our Values of Respect, Integrity, Kindness, Service.

Education
6
Thetford Academy

Thetford academy is an independent school community with a public purpose. our mission is to celebrate the unique worth of all students, nurture their strengths, and challenge them to fulfill their potential.

Education
7
The Oakridge School

To inspire students to seek their full potential in academics, the arts, and athletics in a challenging and nurturing environment that cultivates social responsibility, mutual respect, and personal integrity.

Education
8
The Canterbury Episcopal School

The Canterbury Episcopal School provides a rigorous education in the humanities, arts, social and natural sciences for students in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade. The faculty encourages Canterbury students to explore and examine a…

—
9
Providence Preparatory Charter School

The mission of pvd prep is to prepare a diverse group of providence middle school students for college preparatory high schools.

Education
10
Western School of Science and Technology

To provide a rigorous and relevant college-preparatory program, grounded in our belief in the ability of every child to succeed at a high level.

Education
11
Nantucket Partnership for Children Inc

Nantucket new school is an independent day school serving students in pre-school through grade eight and strong wings is an outdoor adventure school.

—
12
Wethersfield Historical Society

The purpose of the "Society" is to collect, preserve, and interpret Wethersfield's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwich Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BB&N SCHOOL: $37,500 · OtherBB&N SCHOOLST ANDREWS: $31,000 · OtherST ANDREWSST BARNABAS CHURCH: $4,500 · OtherFRANCIS OUTMET SCHOLARSHIP ANN: $4,000 · OtherANGEL FLIGHT OF NEW ENGLAND: $3,765 · Other+11 more: $17,950 · Other+11 moreWomens Justice Initiative Inc: $8,000 · EducationWomens Justice I…GREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $6,000 · EducationGREENWICH ACADEM…OSTERVILLE FREE LIBRARY CORPORATION: $3,000 · EducationOSTERVILLE FREE …THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA: $2,000 · EducationTHE PROTESTANT E…WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $1,500 · EducationWATERSIDE SCHOOL…BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $1,250 · EducationBRUNSWICK SCHOOL…CAPE KID MEALS INC: $9,000 · Food & NutritionCAPE KID M…THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP: $4,500 · Food & NutritionTHE FAMILY…United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCOTOCHESET HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentSQUASH HAVEN INC: $2,250 · Human ServicesOSTERVILLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION: $150 · Community Improvement
Other$98,715Education$21,750Food & Nutrition$13,500Philanthropy$5,000Arts & Culture$3,000Environment$2,500Human Services$2,250Community Improvement$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPE KID MEALS INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWomens Justice Initiative Inc: $8,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOSTERVILLE FREE LIBRARY CORPORATION: $3,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOTOCHESET HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $3,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSQUASH HAVEN INC: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOSTERVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOSTERVILLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION: $150 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAPE KID MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Womens Justice Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP ↗
  • Who funds OSTERVILLE FREE LIBRARY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COTOCHESET HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUASH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds OSTERVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds OSTERVILLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paul and Jill Kaneb Family Charitable FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paul and Jill Kaneb Family Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gregory Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gregory Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Three Bays Preservation Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Squash Haven Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Osterville Historical Society Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gregory Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Gregory Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gregory Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph