Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Paul and Jill Kaneb Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$177k
Granted FY2023
26
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$35k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

89% of Paul and Jill Kaneb Family Charitable Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 12 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Paul and Jill Kaneb Family Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 19 organizations, $177k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
19
17
20
15
21
19
22
19
23
12
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$1.4MEnvironment$438kEducation$282kHealth$247kArts & Culture$109kRecreation & Sports$17kAnimals$8kHuman Services$650Other$0
02FY2023 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k18 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
$2,200
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN$35,000
CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$30,050
GATEWAY ACADEMY$25,000
HEBRON ACADEMY$20,000
CAHOON MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$12,750
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$12,000
INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC$10,200
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART$7,000
152 COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION INC$5,000
BARNSTABLE CLEAN WATER COALITION$2,500
JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION$2,500
RIVERSIDE THEATRE$2,200
OSTERVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC$1,200
WIANNO SAILING FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER: $50 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
TN
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 25 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
24

Total granted

$1.1M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+25%

Still filing today

64%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $110k · revenue +36%
  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2023 · $69k · revenue +44%
  • CM
    CAHOON MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • AU
    ANTHRACITE UPLAND POINTING DOG ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +13%
  • HM
    HELP ME SEE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +25%
  • BJ
    BOBBY JONES CHIARI & SYRINGOMYELIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
4
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
5
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
6
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
7
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
8
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
9
Aquidneck Island Land Trust

To preserve and steward aquidneck island's open spaces for the lasting benefit of the community while connecting people with the land that defines the island's natural character.

Environment
10
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
11
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walnut Hill Center for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Anthracite Upland Pointing Dog Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsCancer Support OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesEarly Childhood Education C…Faith-Based Senior LivingYouth Sports Booster Organi…Independent K-8 SchoolsElementary Literacy TutoringPregnancy Support ServicesYouth Development CentersPublic Library SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%3%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr9%23%35–55yr12%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr15%66%20–35yr9%17%35–55yr12%15%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,005

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
26/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,371,263 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more — $5,080 · PhilanthropyINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $300,650 · EnvironmentINDIAN RIVER LAND TR…MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $110,050 · EnvironmentMCKEE BOTANICAL GARD…THREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC — $15,000 · Environment+3 more — $13,275 · EnvironmentHebron Academy Incorporated — $185,000 · EducationHebron Acad…COLGATE UNIVERSITY — $68,927 · EducationCOLGATE UNI…+6 more — $3,325 · EducationCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $130,050 · OtherCAPE COD H…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $38,000 · OtherMASS GENER…GATEWAY ACADEMY — $25,000 · OtherGATEWAY AC…THE TRUSTEES ARMSTRONG-KELLEY PARK — $15,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTE…+26 more — $27,931 · Other+26 moreCAHOON MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC — $51,250 · Arts & CultureVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC — $31,400 · Arts & Culture152 COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $11,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $550 · Arts & CultureINDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $73,950 · Health+7 more — $3,375 · HealthWIANNO SAILING FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $25 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$1,376,343Environment$438,975Education$257,252Other$235,981Arts & Culture$94,700Health$77,325Recreation & Sports$1,525

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,371,263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $300,650 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetHebron Academy Incorporated — $185,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $110,050 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $68,927 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAHOON MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC — $51,250 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC — $31,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budget152 COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $11,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetOSTERVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $5,700 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC — $5,080 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBARNSTABLE LAND TRUST INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOSTERVILLE FREE LIBRARY CORPORATION — $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWIANNO SAILING FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT OF NEW ENGLAND INC — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHELP ME SEE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOBBY JONES CHIARI & SYRINGOMYELIA FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLONGWOOD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOSTERVILLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION — $175 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEACHINC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCETON NURSERY SCHOOL — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Peddie School — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANTIQUE BOAT MUSEUM — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALNUT HILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOTUIT ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donald C McGraw Foundation IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donald C McGraw Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Gregory Family Foundation Inc · Holbrook R & Sarah M Davis Foundation Inc · Bilezikian Family Foundation Inc · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Paul and Jill Kaneb Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Three Bays Preservation Inc18% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Barnstable Land Trust Inc4% of income from government
  • Princeton Nursery School4% of income from government
  • Longwood Symphony Orchestra Inc4% of income from government
  • Osterville Historical Society Inc1% of income from government
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc0% of income from government
  • Cahoon Museum of American Art Inc0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
  • The Learning Alliance Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph