Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Greenwell Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$215kHuman Services$86kEducation$35kHealth$32kYouth Development$10kPhilanthropy$10kArts & Culture$5kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
$12,132
Median grant
1
States reached
$970k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OwensboroDaviess Co Family YMCA$25,000
Crossroads Inc$12,132
Opportunity Center of Owensboro$10,000
Wendell Foster's Campus for Disabil$9,349
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Opportunity Center of Owensboro: $10k → 13%Puzzle Pieces Inc: $5k → 13%Puzzle Pieces Inc: $10k → 13%Dream Riders of Kentucky: $10k → 13%Dream Riders of Kentucky: $10k → 13%Dream Riders of Kentucky: $9k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$299k · 8 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$299k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
-6%

Still filing today

63%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HELP OFFICE OF OWENSBORO INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue +35%
  • MS
    MY SISTERS KEEPER INCORPORATED
    2× · 2022–2023 · $33k · revenue +2%
  • PP
    PUZZLE PIECES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +238%

Funded once

  • DP
    DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • CN
    Care Net Pregnancy Center of Owensb
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Owensboro Area Shelter Information and Services Inc

To provide shelter, support, and advocacy to families affected by domestic violence

—
2
Waynesboro New Hope Shelter Inc

The organization provide temporary housing for men, women, and children and offer guidance and support for re-entry into the community as self reliant, independent, and contributing members of society

Human Services
3
The Open Shelter Inc

The open shelter provides, directly or by referral emergency shelter and assistance for homeless and marginally housed persons in central ohio, especially the most vulnerable among them; and to provide directly or by referral, coordinated,…

Housing & Shelter
4
Community Homeless Outreach and Support Inc

To provide a safe, comfortable environment for women and children seeking shelter and connect them with resources to help change their lives.

Housing & Shelter
5
Open Doors

Homeless services

—
6
House of Hope of Kentucky Inc

To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…

Health
7
New Hope Shelter

Provide homeless with individualized support services and tailored housing solutions with a goal of obtaining and maintaining affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
8
Kingdom Pillars

Empowering women to wholeness and self-worth with providing a safe haven.

Public Benefit
9
Fresh Start Outreach Ministry Inc

It is the mission of Fresh Start Ministry to be the hands and feet of God by serving others in need in Monroe County. we have a mens and womans shelter and a program to help people get back on there feet

Human Services
10
Womens Opportunity House

Assistance to women

—
11
Options Inc

Options provides shelter and assistance for abused women and children. it is open 24 hours a day for referrels, advocacy, support and couseling.

Human Services
12
Opportunity Enterprises Inc

To promote the growth, independence, and recovery of the individuals it serves. the organization serves adults with developmental disabilities in their home and in the communities in which they live.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is My Sisters Keeper Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Dream Riders of Kentucky Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HELP OFFICE OF OWENSBORO INC: $84,625 · OtherHELP OFFICE OF OWENSBORO INCOwensboro Family Y: $40,625 · OtherOwensboro Family YOwensboroDaviess Co Family YMCA: $25,000 · OtherOwensboroDaviess Co Family YMCAFamily Y: $15,000 · OtherFamily YCare Net Pregnancy Center of Owensb: $10,000 · OtherWendell Foster's Campus for Disabil: $9,349 · OtherGirls Inc of Owensboro Daviess Coun: $7,500 · Other+3 more: $8,800 · OtherMY SISTERS KEEPER INCORPORATED: $32,625 · Housing & ShelterMY SISTERS KEEPER INC…CROSSROADS INC: $32,132 · Housing & ShelterCROSSROADS INCDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterDANIEL PITINO SHELTER…FRESH START FOR WOMEN INC: $50,625 · PhilanthropyFRESH START FOR W…UNITED WAY OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE…DREAM RIDERS OF KENTUCKY INC: $28,473 · Human ServicesDREAM RIDERS OF…PUZZLE PIECES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesPUZZLE PIECES I…OPPORTUNITY CENTER OF OWENSBORO INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY CEN…RIVERPARK CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$200,899Housing & Shelter$74,757Philanthropy$60,625Human Services$53,473Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHELP OFFICE OF OWENSBORO INC: $84,625 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetFRESH START FOR WOMEN INC: $50,625 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetMY SISTERS KEEPER INCORPORATED: $32,625 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetCROSSROADS INC: $32,132 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetDREAM RIDERS OF KENTUCKY INC: $28,473 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetPUZZLE PIECES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOPPORTUNITY CENTER OF OWENSBORO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRIVERPARK CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HELP OFFICE OF OWENSBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESH START FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MY SISTERS KEEPER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds DREAM RIDERS OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds PUZZLE PIECES INC ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY CENTER OF OWENSBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERPARK CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Impact 100 - Owensboro IncKY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impact 100 - Owensboro Inc · Marilyn & William Young Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Sara Hemingway Ex Di · The Community Foundation Inc · Lawrence & Augusta Hager Educational Foundation Inc · Civitan Club of Owensboro Kentucky Inc · Lester E Yeager Charitable Trust B · United Way of the Ohio Valley Inc · Owensboro Health Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Public Life Foundation of Owensboro · Baird Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Greenwell Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Greenwell Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Greenwell Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Greenwell Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greenwell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph