Loading…
· Private foundation
The Greenwell Foundation Inc
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$56k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
1
Communities
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of The Greenwell Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
children
2019
homeless shelter
2020
women children
2021
—
2022
building
2023
completerenovationspurchase
2024
purchase
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
$12,132
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- OwensboroDaviess Co Family YMCA$25,000
- Crossroads Inc$12,132
- Opportunity Center of Owensboro$10,000
- Wendell Foster's Campus for Disabil$9,349
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$299k · 8 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
8
8
Total granted
$299k
$51k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+98%
+32%
Still filing today
50%
38%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHelp Office of Owensboro Inc5× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue +35%
- FSFresh Start for Women Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $51k · revenue +211%
- DRDream Riders of Kentucky3× · 2021–2023 · $28k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- CNCare Net Pregnancy Center of Owensbone grant, 2019 · $10k
- DPDaniel Pitino Shelter Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +32%
- UWUnited Way of the Ohio Valleyone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Open Shelter Inc
Provide support services to homeless individuals and help reintegrate them back into society.
Housing & Shelter
2
Waynesboro New Hope Shelter Inc
We provide temporary housing for menwomen and children and offer guidance and support for reentry into the community as selfreliant independent and contributing members of society
Human Services
3
Open Doors Inc
To provide shelter for the homeless
Human Services
4
Opport-Unity
We provide low income housing
Human Services
5
Open Doors
Homeless services
—
6
Open Door Concierge Services Inc
Provides housing stability, housing navigation and social security claim assistance.
Human Services
7
Peace By Piece Nj Inc
PBPNJ is a DDD approved 501c3 non-profit organiation driven to enhance the lives of those faced with intellectual/developmental disabilities and their families. Our goal is to provide life long support and services through a community…
Human Services
8
New Hope Shelter
Provide homeless with individualized support services and tailored housing solutions with a goal of obtaining and maintaining affordable housing.
Housing & Shelter
9
Owensboro Area Shelter Information and
To provide shelter, treatment, support and advocacy to women and their children who are victims of domestic violence.
—
10
His House Outreach Ministries Inc
We equip and empower women transitioning out of incarceration by providing stable employment and housing, life skills, and mentors to walk alongside them. Through this, we inspire hope, disrupt cycles of incarceration, and restore families.
Housing & Shelter
11
Open Door Counseling Center
Open Door Counseling Center is a HUD Certified Comprehensive Housing Counseling Agency to educate and assist underserved households to obtain and retain affordable permanent housing; provide immediate basic human needs for community…
—
12
Our Home of Hope Inc
To exhibit christian compassion by providing a warm welcoming home-like environment to those individuals in need of supportive care in an atmosphere of respect and dignity.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Center of Owensboro Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dream Riders of Kentucky Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$233,524Philanthropy$60,625Human Services$53,473Housing & Shelter$47,132
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Help Office of Owensboro Inc ↗
- Who funds Fresh Start for Women Inc ↗
- Who funds Crossroads Inc ↗
- Who funds Dream Riders of Kentucky ↗
- Who funds Puzzle Pieces Inc ↗
- Who funds Opportunity Center of Owensboro ↗
- Who funds Daniel Pitino Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Ohio Valley ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Owensboro ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation IncVA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Impact 100 - Owensboro Inc · Marilyn & William Young Charitable · Owensboro Health Inc · Civitan Club of Owensboro Kentucky · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Community Foundation Of · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation The Greenwell Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Fresh Start for Women Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 814961663 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Fresh Start for Women Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Greenwell Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Greenwell Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines