Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gramm Family Foundation - Rbc Trust Accou

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$54kHealth$40kArts & Culture$35kHuman Services$31kPhilanthropy$24kCommunity Improvement$21kYouth Development$19kEducation$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$686k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST CHURCH$7,500
PET HELPERS$7,500
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$5,750
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$3,750
ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH$3,750
YOUTH POWER 365$3,750
OUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL CHURCH$3,700
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$3,500
DIGS WITH DIGNITY$2,803
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$2,000
MAGGIE'S PLACE$2,000
RELEVANT RADIO INC$2,000
CATHOLIC DAUGHTERS OF AMERICA$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,803
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN AWAITING PARENTS: $3k → 14%MY SISTERS HOUSE: $7k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4k → 14%CHILDREN AWAITING PARENTS: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $2k → 11%CHILDREN AWAITING PARENTS: $2k → 14%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $1k → 11%CHILDREN AWAITING PARENTS: $2k → 14%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $1k → 11%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $1k → 11%ROOTS & WINGS: $3k → 11%ROOTS & WINGS: $2k → 11%HAPPILY EVER AFTER LEAGUE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
RI
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$233k · 35 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
32

Total granted

$233k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+17%

Still filing today

66%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Y
    YOUTHPOWER365
    4× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +52%
  • IG
    IMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • FT
    FAMILIES THRIVE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +498%

Funded once

  • MS
    My Sister's House Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +88%
  • SC
    SANTA CRUZ RECORDING STUDIOS - SCHOLAR
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • XT
    XS TENNIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
5
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
6
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
7
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
8
Better Together Strengthening Familes Inc

Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…

Human Services
9
Girls Incorporated of Metro Denver

To inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold.

Youth Development
10
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
11
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
12
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Designs for Dignity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/45
Grantees still filing
26/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST CHURCH INC: $38,444 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH INCSANTA CRUZ RECORDING STUDIO: $24,378 · OtherSANTA CRUZ RECORDING STUDIOSTRATTON FOUNDATION: $19,488 · OtherSTRATTON FOUNDATIONBEVERLY HILLS POLICE OFFICERS: $10,324 · OtherROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $6,972 · Other+47 more: $103,795 · Other+47 moreFAMILIES THRIVE INC: $10,157 · Human ServicesFAMILIES THR…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARR…My Sister's House Inc: $6,500 · Human ServicesMy Sister's …MAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $6,083 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S PLA…Roots and Wings Inc: $4,500 · Human ServicesRoots and Wi…HAPPILY EVER AFTER LEAGUE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado: $4,189 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,750 · HealthBethesda Hospital Inc: $1,750 · HealthNAMI National: $1,000 · HealthNAMI WESTSIDE LA: $900 · HealthYOUTHPOWER365: $11,161 · PhilanthropyIMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO: $10,182 · PhilanthropyVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $1,500 · PhilanthropyDESIGNS FOR DIGNITY: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPET HELPERS INC: $7,500 · AnimalsMISSION WOLF: $5,466 · AnimalsSEMPER FI SERVICE DOGS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsHIGH JUMP: $6,000 · EducationALPHA PHI FOUNDATION INC: $1,083 · EducationPROJECT EDUCATION PLUS: $1,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationGULF STREAM SCHOOL INC: $574 · EducationWaukegan To College NFP: $500 · EducationST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $5,083 · Food & NutritionCHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM: $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$203,401Human Services$35,240Health$24,589Philanthropy$23,843Animals$13,966Education$10,157Food & Nutrition$8,083

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTHPOWER365: $11,161 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO: $10,182 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILIES THRIVE INC: $10,157 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPET HELPERS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $6,972 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMy Sister's House Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $6,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $6,083 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH JUMP: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON PANTRY: $5,874 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMISSION WOLF: $5,466 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $5,083 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIGS WITH DIGNITY CORPORATION: $4,803 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRoots and Wings Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado: $4,189 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONEGOAL: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREVERSED RESCUE: $3,333 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNPR FOUNDATION: $3,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKids in Focus: $2,583 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO SURVIVORS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBethesda Hospital Inc: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPILY EVER AFTER LEAGUE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA PHI FOUNDATION INC: $1,083 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT EDUCATION PLUS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetI Grow Chicago NFP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI WESTSIDE LA: $900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLake George Land Conservancy Inc: $866 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGULF STREAM SCHOOL INC: $574 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWaukegan To College NFP: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTHPOWER365 ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES THRIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PET HELPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds My Sister's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH JUMP ↗
  • Who funds COMMON PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds MISSION WOLF ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds DIGS WITH DIGNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Roots and Wings Inc ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds REVERSED RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds NPR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Kids in Focus ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL19.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Impactassetsinc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gramm Family Foundation - Rbc Trust Accou funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gramm Family Foundation - Rbc Trust Accou. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Bethesda Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gramm Family Foundation - Rbc Trust Accou’s filings →

More from the funding graph