Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Grace Hope and Faith Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$38kYouth Development$26kEducation$9kHuman Services$7kHousing & Shelter$5kScience & Tech$4kHealth$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$174k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENDURANCE LEADERSHIP$4,000
YOUNG LIFE$3,025
FOUNDATION ELEOS$2,000
99 FOR 1$2,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON$1,000
YOUTH APOSTLES$400
AMBASSADOR CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$258
CARING BRIDGE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($96k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($15k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HUMAN COALITION: $100 → 5%FOSTER THE FAMILY: $1k → 12%99 FOR 1: $3k → 4%99 FOR 1: $2k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
NY
OR
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
AL
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($15k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$15k · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 14 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
34

Total granted

$70k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+93%

Still filing today

43%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +59%
  • EL
    ENDURANCE LEADERSHIP INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +27%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    2× · 2019–2020 · $1k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • PC
    PEACE CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • IV
    Independence Village Olde Raleigh
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
A Jesus Mission

A Jesus Mission creates unique opportunities for individuals or teams to serves as Christian missionaires around the world through traditional evangelism, discipleship training, and outreach.

Religion
4
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
5
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
6
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
9
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
10
Tim Robnett Ministries Dba ETeamGlobal

To Identify, Affirm, Train, and Mobilize Ephesians 4 evangelists to equip the church for evangelism.

Religion
11
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
12
Explore God Network
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Foster the Family. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientZILEOS ASSOCIATION: $9,000 · OtherZILEOS ASSOCIATIONPEACE CHURCH: $6,800 · OtherPEACE CHURCHCOLLEGE AMERICA: $5,500 · OtherCOLLEGE AMERICAFOUNDATION ELEOS: $4,000 · OtherFOUNDATION ELEOSIndependence Village Olde Raleigh: $3,000 · Other+32 more: $23,424 · Other+32 moreYOUNG LIFE: $24,721 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentENDURANCE LEADERSHIP INC: $14,900 · ReligionENDURANCE LEADE…99 FOR 1: $4,512 · Human ServicesFOSTER THE FAMILY: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF RICHMOND: $600 · HealthBite Me Cancer Inc: $412 · HealthFREEDOM'S PROMISE: $300 · HealthCaringBridge: $100 · HealthImago Dei Neighborhood School: $1,200 · EducationITS NOT OK Inc: $300 · InternationalTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $77 · Philanthropy
Other$61,724Youth Development$25,721Religion$14,900Human Services$5,612Health$1,412Education$1,200International$300Philanthropy$77

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE: $24,721 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetENDURANCE LEADERSHIP INC: $14,900 over 4y, 1.3% of budget99 FOR 1: $4,512 over 2y, 23% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER THE FAMILY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF RICHMOND: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH EXPERIMENT: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMissionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBite Me Cancer Inc: $412 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetITS NOT OK Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM'S PROMISE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $77 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ENDURANCE LEADERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds 99 FOR 1 ↗
  • Who funds Imago Dei Neighborhood School ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER THE FAMILY ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH EXPERIMENT ↗
  • Who funds Missionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bite Me Cancer Inc ↗
  • Who funds ITS NOT OK Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM'S PROMISE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Grace Hope and Faith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Grace Hope and Faith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grace Hope and Faith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph