Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Grace and John T Harrington Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0162% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192022.

Arts & Culture$41kHealth$35kAnimals$27kHuman Services$18kPhilanthropy$12kEducation$8kCommunity Improvement$3kCrime & Legal$3kInternational$2kOther$94k
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
BRONSON HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
SOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK$5,000
LENDING HANDS OF MICHIGAN$2,000
MASS AUDOBON SOCIETY$2,000
ASPEN SANTA FE BALLET$2,000
SIERRA CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDSAFE: $1k → 16%MIRA FOUNDATION USA: $250 → 10%BACK PACKS OF LOVE: $1k → 12%BACK PACKS OF LOVE: $750 → 12%BACK PACKS OF LOVE: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
MI
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$119k · 15 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
21

Total granted

$119k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+45%

Still filing today

60%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • TW
    TOMORROW'S WOMEN
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +83%
  • CATE SCHOOL
    3× · 2019–2021 · $8k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CC
    COLLIER CO PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • KA
    KITCHEN ANGELS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Santa Fe Conservation Trust

The santa fe conservation trust partners with our community to keep northern new mexico's living lands and people flourishing together. we protect culturally and environmentally significant landscapes, ignite people's passion for nature…

Environment
3
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
5
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
6
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
7
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
8
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
11
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
12
Tmc Healthcare

Our mission is to provide exceptional health care with compassion.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of Santa Fe Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mira Foundation Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Food Pantries & AssistanceLand Conservation Organizat…Elementary Literacy TutoringIndependent K-8 SchoolsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts OrganizationsProfessional Ballet Compani…Animal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%48%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,538

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TOMORROW'S WOMEN — $15,000 · OtherTOMORROW'S WOMENCOLLIER CO PUBLIC LIBRARY — $10,000 · OtherCOLLIER CO PUBLIC LIBRARYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $7,250 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INC — $6,000 · OtherST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INCFRIENDSHIP CHURCH — $6,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CHURCHKITCHEN ANGELS INC — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherBURTLER ART INSTITUTE — $5,000 · OtherSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK — $5,000 · OtherPASSION COMMUNITY CHURCH — $3,500 · Other+18 more — $34,000 · Other+18 moreASPEN SANTA FE BALLET — $22,000 · Arts & CultureASPEN SANTA FE BALL…KINGMAN MUSEUM INC — $13,000 · Arts & CultureKINGMAN MUSEUM INCKalamazoo Institute of Arts — $4,000 · Arts & CultureKalamazoo Institute…MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,000 · Arts & CultureBronson Health Foundation — $30,000 · HealthBronson Health F…SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC — $2,500 · HealthSANTA FE MOUNTAI…LENDING HANDS OF MICHIGAN INC — $2,000 · HealthLENDING HANDS OF…SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $19,500 · AnimalsSANTA FE ANI…HOMEWARD TRAILS ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $7,000 · AnimalsHOMEWARD TRA…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 · Human ServicesBACKPACKS OF LOVE INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesCHILDSAFE — $1,000 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesTURNING THE PAGE — $7,250 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyCATE SCHOOL — $8,250 · Education
Other$101,750Arts & Culture$41,000Health$34,500Animals$26,500Human Services$18,250Philanthropy$12,250Education$8,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBronson Health Foundation — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN SANTA FE BALLET — $22,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $19,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMORROW'S WOMEN — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKINGMAN MUSEUM INC — $13,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCATE SCHOOL — $8,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $7,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING THE PAGE — $7,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEWARD TRAILS ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKalamazoo Institute of Arts — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF KALAMAZOO INC — $3,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLENDING HANDS OF MICHIGAN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACKPACKS OF LOVE INC — $2,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDSAFE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMira Foundation USA Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Kalamazoo Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Mike and Sharon Seelye Family Foundation · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Grace and John T Harrington Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph