· Private foundation
Tyler-Little Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k102 grants · $359k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $245k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AIR ZOO LEGACY FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $25,000 |
| HERITAGE COMMUNITY OF KALAMAZOO FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BRONSON HEALTH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| KALAMAZOO CULTURAL CENTER | $25,000 |
| FARMERS ALLEY THEATRE | $25,000 |
| KALAMAZOO COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $20,000 |
| GRYPHON PLACE | $20,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN | $15,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF KALAMAZOO | $10,000 |
| FIRST TEE OF WEST MICHIGAN | $10,000 |
| WMU HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $370k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
147 repeat relationships — 73 still active in FY2024, 74 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KSKALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA8× · 2017–2024 · $613k · revenue +42%
- AZAIR ZOO LEGACY FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $276k · revenue +191%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KALAMAZOO INC5× · 2020–2024 · $165k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- MSMILESTONE SENIOR SERVICESone grant, 2023 · $66k
- LILASALLE INSTITUTEone grant, 2020 · $50k
- SOStewards of Kleinstuckone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -97%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the kalamazoo foundation for excellence is to support the goals of the city of kalamazoo, fund aspirational investments in the city, and empower kalamazoo residents to achieve the lives they want for themselves and their…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.
Our mission is to help people to live longer, healthier lives with dignity, and to use all of our resources to give them everything they expect and deserve in comprehensive cardiovascular care for their families and themselves.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
Michigan Colleges Alliance is a collective of excellent independent colleges and universities located throughout Michigan. MCA helps students pursue their educational goals by organizing on campus tours, funding scholarships and connecting…
Creating healthy communities - together
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kalamazoo Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Genevieve and Donald S Gilmore Fdn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
134 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 134 of the 216 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds AIR ZOO LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KALAMAZOO INC ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE COMMUNITY OF KALAMAZOO ↗
- Who funds IRVING S GILMORE INTERNATIONAL KEYBOARD ↗
- Who funds Bronson Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds VIBRANT KALAMAZOO ↗
- Who funds Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center ↗
- Who funds Kalamazoo Institute of Arts ↗
- Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds Kalamazoo Nature Center ↗
- Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREVENTION WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION ↗
- Who funds Kalamazoo Civic Theatre ↗
- Who funds MINISTRY WITH COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GRYPHON PLACE ↗
- Who funds FARMERS ALLEY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds LAKE MICHIGAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ASCENSION BORGESS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kalamazoo Community Foundation · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · Suzanne Upjohn Delano Parish Foundation · The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · United Way of South Central Michigan · H P & Genevieve Connable Fund · Preston S and Barbara J Parish Foundation · Jim Gilmore Jr Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tyler-Little Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tyler-Little Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tyler-Little Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.