Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gorbach Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$98kHealth$76kArts & Culture$30kInternational$7kCivil Rights$3kEnvironment$3kReligion$3kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$132k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WI PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,033
TANGLEWOOD$1,030
Individual grant recipient$1,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$1,000
STOUGHTON OPERA HOUSE$1,000
FISTULA FOUNDATION$633
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION FOUNDATION$520
STEP UP$518
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$500
HEALTHY CLIMATE WISCONSIN$500
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO$500
ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH$500
Individual grant recipient$500
TOPANGA COALITION FOR EMEGENCY PREPAREDNESS$307
ALL SEATED IN A BARN$261
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STEP UP ON SECOND: $200 → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $500 → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
NM
KS
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$113k · 32 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
57

Total granted

$113k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+43%

Still filing today

53%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    5× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +50%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +98%
  • The Fistula Foundation
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • B
    BSO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • BO
    BERKSHIRE OPERA FESTIVAL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TI
    TEMPLE ISAIAH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
9
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
10
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
11
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
12
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Women Inc; the most unlike its peers is Verdi Chorus co Francoise Sorgen-Goldschmidt. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/51
Grantees still filing
39/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $87,500 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITYTrustees of Tufts College: $63,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College+2 more: $1,600 · EducationTANGLEWOOD: $9,030 · OtherTANGLEWOODWI PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5,034 · OtherWI PLANNED PARENTHOODBSO: $5,000 · OtherBSOBERKSHIRE OPERA FESTIVAL: $5,000 · OtherBERKSHIRE OPERA FESTIVALSTOUGHTON OPERA HOUSE: $4,000 · OtherSTOUGHTON OPERA HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE ISAIAH: $2,300 · Other+67 more: $26,684 · Other+67 moreThe Fistula Foundation: $3,333 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $1,850 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $400 · HealthTrust Women Foundation Inc: $250 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $240 · Health+2 more: $250 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,500 · InternationalWATERAID AMERICA INC: $300 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $300 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $200 · International+6 more: $550 · InternationalJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC: $2,875 · Arts & CultureVerdi Chorus co Francoise Sorgen-Goldschmidt: $1,050 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $500 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUE: $500 · Arts & CultureCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $2,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES: $250 · PhilanthropyTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Education$152,100Other$61,048Health$6,323International$5,850Arts & Culture$4,925Philanthropy$2,250Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $87,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $63,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $3,333 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC: $2,875 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $1,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL: $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVerdi Chorus co Francoise Sorgen-Goldschmidt: $1,050 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY CLIMATE WISCONSIN INC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTAKING THE REINS: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIEWPOINT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES INC: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOPANGA COALITION FOR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS: $307 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWATERAID AMERICA INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEducational Fund to Stop Gun Violence: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO READ: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION: $228 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEABLE FEAST INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PALISADES CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Verdi Chorus co Francoise Sorgen-Goldschmidt ↗
  • Who funds Guttmacher Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY CLIMATE WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
  • Who funds VIEWPOINT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HONOR THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg FoundationPA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gorbach Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gorbach Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Moveable Feast Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gorbach Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph