· Private foundation
The Goodnow Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k67 grants · $202k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $754k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN | $100,000 |
| FAMILY CENTERS | $50,000 |
| AMERICARES | $45,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $35,000 |
| CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN EAST DAKOTA | $30,000 |
| FAMILY CENTERS | $30,000 |
| SPIRIT OF AMERICA | $30,000 |
| AMERICARES FREE CLINICS | $30,000 |
| FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY | $30,000 |
| GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND | $30,000 |
| EISENHOWER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND | $25,000 |
| THE FRESH AIR FUND | $25,000 |
| NUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $518k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of The Goodnow Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in CT; read by stated purpose it is 55% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
122 repeat relationships — 94 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Save The Children Federation Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +1%- FCFAMILY CENTERS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $378k · revenue +67%
- WCWildlife Conservation Society4× · 2021–2024 · $130k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- NTNUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVEone grant, 2021 · $50k
- NBNEW BEGINNINGS COMMUNITY CHURCH INCone grant, 2021 · $36k
- CCCATALYST CT INCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
The mission of the new canaan land trust is to foster a connection between the new canaan community and its natural resources through the conservation and sustainable stewardship of our open space.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Norwalk Acts Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Stepping Stones Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 160 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF COASTAL AND WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds NUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
- Who funds BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP ↗
- Who funds PERSON TO PERSON INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARVER INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ELM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MERCY LEARNING CENTER OF BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
- Who funds Spirit of America Worldwide ↗
- Who funds The Eisenhower Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds DARIEN LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · The Herbert & Nell Singer Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Stamford Rotary Trust Fund · Viking Global Foundation Inc · The Meredith and Whitney George Family Foundation Inc · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · Peoples United Community Foundation · The Darien Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Goodnow Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Laurel House Inc — 68% of income from government
- East Norwalk Blue Inc — 60% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Family & Children's Agency Inc — 47% of income from government
- Catalyst Ct Inc — 37% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Village Inc — 32% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Stamford Public Education Foundation Inc — 22% of income from government
- Family Centers Inc — 20% of income from government
- The Carver Inc — 16% of income from government
- Housing Development Fund Inc — 15% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- United Way of Coastal and Western Connecticut Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Community Fund of Darien — 9% of income from government
- Stamford Museum & Nature Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Flying Cloud Institute Inc — 6% of income from government
- Norwalk Acts Inc — 6% of income from government
- Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mercy Learning Center of Bridgeport Inc — 4% of income from government
- Fairview Hospital — 3% of income from government
- Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
- Women's Mentoring Network Inc — 1% of income from government
- All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Norwalk Art Space Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Darien Nature Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Goodnow Fund?
Find your warmest path to The Goodnow Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.