Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

New York · Nonprofit

THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION

THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION (New York) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $111,250 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($56,100). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 50% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$1.1M
Revenue FY2024
12
Funders on record
$111k
Grants received
$14M
Net assets
5/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($435k) Expenses 100 ($418k) Net assets 100 ($12M)2018 Revenue 108 ($468k) Expenses 145 ($608k) Net assets 92 ($11M)2019 Revenue 126 ($548k) Expenses 146 ($609k) Net assets 104 ($12M)2020 Revenue 146 ($634k) Expenses 138 ($578k) Net assets 115 ($13M)2021 Revenue 232 ($1.0M) Expenses 166 ($694k) Net assets 126 ($14M)2022 Revenue 190 ($824k) Expenses 205 ($856k) Net assets 103 ($12M)2023 Revenue 171 ($743k) Expenses 195 ($815k) Net assets 114 ($13M)2024 Revenue 257 ($1.1M) Expenses 241 ($1.0M) Net assets 123 ($14M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (257)Expenses (241)Net assets (123)
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income fell $10k → $9k.

1 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)50% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 50% of grant income and the top three 68%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

50% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION.

50%
largest funder
68%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 96% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 57% · 2021 78% · 2022 75% · 2023 59%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

20% of THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 42% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

50% of THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $55k that is directly attributable, 78% of it comes from funders outside New York, across 6 states.

NY
MA
NJ
CT
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $56k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 12 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION?
THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION (New York) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $111,250 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($56,100). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 50% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $111,250 in grants to THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION?
Schwab Charitable Fund is the largest funder on record, with $56,100 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 12funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing