Skip to content
The Goodman Family Foundation Ua 7270 as Amended at a glance

· Private foundation

The Goodman Family Foundation Ua 7270 as Amended

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$129k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$276kRecreation & Sports$260kArts & Culture$198kPublic Benefit$192kEnvironment$10kHealth$8kHuman Services$6kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARK CENTURY SCHOOL$55,000
CITY PARKS FOUNDATION$34,320
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC$12,600
GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL$10,000
MIRIAMS HOUSE$5,000
THE PRESIDENTS AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
WINGS OF RESCUE$2,000
THE RADCLIFFE CHORAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE JEWISH BOARD: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ID
MN
NY
MA
WY
CA
DC
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$677k · 10 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
33

Total granted

$677k
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+21%

Still filing today

80%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $259k · revenue +19%
  • PC
    PARK CENTURY SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $151k · revenue +11%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $124k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • HU
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY - KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVT
    one grant, 2018 · $190k
  • FB
    FIRST BOOK
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -14%
  • TE
    THE EARTHFIRE INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
9
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
12
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Landmarks Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Art Association of Jackson Hole. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARK CENTURY SCHOOL: $151,000 · EducationPARK CENTURY SCHOOLTREE ACADEMY: $37,500 · EducationTREE ACADEMYCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATIONTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LE…FIRST BOOK: $15,000 · EducationFIRST BOOK+3 more: $11,266 · EducationCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $258,660 · Recreation & SportsCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INCHARVARD UNIVERSITY - KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVT: $190,002 · OtherHARVARD UNIVERSITY - KENN…+24 more: $33,190 · Other+24 moreLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $124,165 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMON…GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureGRAND TETON MUSIC FEST…+6 more: $10,300 · Arts & CultureTHE EARTHFIRE INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · InternationalNOT ONE MORE VET INC: $2,500 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,000 · Health
Education$274,766Recreation & Sports$258,660Other$223,192Arts & Culture$194,465Environment$10,000International$10,000Health$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $258,660 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPARK CENTURY SCHOOL: $151,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $124,165 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTREE ACADEMY: $37,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST BOOK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EARTHFIRE INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOT ONE MORE VET INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Art Association of Jackson Hole: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRadcliffe Choral Society Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPACER CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC: $780 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASTERVOICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMadison Square Boys & Girls Club: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN GAYNOR SCHOOL: $266 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY GYMNASTIC FOUNDATION MICHAEL CATES: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOLICE ASSOCIATION OF THE TOWN OF HARRISON NEW YORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jewish Communal FundMorgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Raymond James Charita…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY13.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Goodman Family Foundation Ua 7270 as Amended funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Goodman Family Foundation Ua 7270 as Amended. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goodman Family Foundation Ua 7270 as Amended’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home