Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Good Works Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$434k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$3.7MEducation$1.0MCivil Rights$181kEnvironment$171kHealth$44kInternational$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$38kScience & Tech$33kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $88k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $196k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICA LA$150,000
HAMMER MUSEUM$30,000
PORTLAND ART MUSEUM$25,000
SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE$25,000
PERFORMANCE ART MUSEUM$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
TACAW$20,700
ASPEN MUSIC FESTIVAL AND SCHOOL$20,000
LOS ANGELES OPERA$15,000
CENTER FOR ART AND ADVOCACY$10,000
JAPANCRAFT21$7,500
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$5,000
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
BETH MORRISON PROJECTS$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 67 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

67 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

67
29

Total granted

$5.3M
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

66%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IL
    ICA LA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +236% · 25% of their budget
  • AM
    ART MATTERS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.1M · revenue +39% · 92% of their budget
  • SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $870k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • CF
    Coalition for Engaged Education
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -8%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +12%
  • WC
    Watershed Collaborative Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
2
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
4
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
5
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
6
Arts for La

Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.

Arts & Culture
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
9
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
10
The Sculpture Center Inc

See schedule osculpturecenter leads the conversation on contemporary art by supporting artistic innovation and independent thought highlighting sculpture's specific potential to change the way we engage with the world. positioning artists'…

Arts & Culture
11
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
12
Museum of Latin American Art

The specific purpose of this corporation is to: expand knowledge and appreciation of modern and contemporary latin american tine art that has been created since world war ii; to operate a museum; to collect and display latin american…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspen Art Museum; the most unlike its peers is Art Matters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/66
Grantees still filing
47/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ICA LA: $1,433,200 · Arts & CultureICA LAARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $281,700 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENT…+21 more: $500,700 · Arts & Culture+21 moreART MATTERS INC: $1,120,000 · OtherART MATTERS INCIndividual grant recipient: $155,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOS ANGELES OPERA: $120,165 · OtherLOS ANGELES OPERATACAW: $95,060 · Other+46 more: $533,700 · Other+46 moreSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $870,000 · EducationSARAH LAWRENCE COLLE…CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $40,000 · Education+7 more: $74,000 · Education+7 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $21,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $13,500 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $12,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER: $12,500 · EnvironmentROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $9,000 · Environment+2 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $37,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $27,500 · InternationalTHE ASIA SOCIETY: $10,000 · InternationalAMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC INC (AMREF): $3,000 · International+1 more: $2,500 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR HUMANS AND NATURE: $35,000 · Science & TechVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $15,000 · HealthWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $9,500 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $6,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$2,215,600Other$2,023,925Education$984,000Environment$95,500International$80,500Science & Tech$35,000Health$31,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetICA LA: $1,433,200 over 8y, 25% of budgetART MATTERS INC: $1,120,000 over 4y, 92% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $870,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $281,700 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $59,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUILDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $45,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HUMANS AND NATURE: $35,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE INDUSTRY PRODUCTIONS INC: $35,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $32,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCoalition for Engaged Education: $30,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCLOCKSHOP: $30,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $26,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPORTLAND ART MUSEUM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PERFORMANCE ART MUSEUM: $25,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $21,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBETH MORRISON PROJECTS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM: $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Artists Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Art Base: $12,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER: $12,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWatershed Collaborative Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetThe Land Institute: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASIA SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $9,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD MANOR INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURAL CENTER OF CAPE COD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ICA LA ↗
  • Who funds ART MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BUILDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HUMANS AND NATURE ↗
  • Who funds THE INDUSTRY PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Coalition for Engaged Education ↗
  • Who funds CLOCKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PERFORMANCE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds BETH MORRISON PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds United States Artists Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley FoundationIL21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · California Community Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Pasadena Art Alliance · The Mike Kelley Foundation for the Arts · Audrey & Sydney Irmas Charitable Foundation · The Wilhelm Family Foundation Co Cascade Wilhelm · Perenchio Foundation · Robert Rauschenberg Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · Liberty Hill Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Good Works Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Good Works Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Portland Art Museum: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Good Works Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Good Works Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Good Works’ filings →

More from the funding graph