Skip to content
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio

The organization's mission is to improve the health status of the community it serves.

$3.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$26MCommunity Improvement$1.1MHuman Services$495kCrime & Legal$243kPhilanthropy$197kFood & Nutrition$187kEducation$158kHousing & Shelter$101kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $121k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.4M
$10,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC$1,675,614
TRIHEALTH INC$1,486,269
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$262,500
HEALTHY MOMS & BABES INC$52,878
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$31,500
CINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION$21,000
CINCINNATI ZOO AND BOTANICAL GARDENS$18,375
CANCERFREE KIDS$15,750
FREESTORE FOODBANK$13,125
CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER$10,500
FRIAR'S CLUB INC$10,500
PEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC$7,180
OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI$5,250
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$5,250
FAST CTA DBA CINCINNATI TENNIS FOUNDATION$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $34k → 14%LIFE LEARNING CENTER INC: $5k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $18k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $5k → 16%EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $5k → 16%COVERD GREATER CINCINNATI: $6k → 16%COVERD GREATER CINCINNATI: $5k → 16%SWEET CHEEKS DIAPER BANK: $20k → 16%SWEET CHEEKS DIAPER BANK: $8k → 16%OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $13k → 16%OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
KY
VA
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 39 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
16

Total granted

$27M
$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+20%

Still filing today

92%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14M · revenue +67%
  • UC
    UPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $987k · revenue +135%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2021–2025 · $651k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue +106%
  • BF
    BETHESDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $41k · revenue -29%
  • US
    United Service Organizations of Central and Southern Ohio Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $26k · revenue -38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
2
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
3
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
4
Uc Health Foundation

Uc health foundation is the fundraising entity of the uc healthcare system. our mission is to support groundbreaking work that takes place across the academic health center to provide the best in prevention, treatment, education and…

Health
5
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

—
6
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
7
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
Columbus Medical Association Foundation

The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…

Health
10
The Christ Hospital Foundation

The mission of the christ hospital foundation ('tch fdn') is to support the mission of the christ hospital ('tch'). tch's mission is to improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the…

Health
11
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation of Cincinnati Inc; the most unlike its peers is Healthy Beginnings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/55
Grantees still filing
34/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC: $13,810,786 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INCTRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $8,051,585 · HealthTRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORPBETHESDA INC: $1,536,352 · HealthBETHESDA INC+19 more: $1,926,102 · Health+19 moreTRIHEALTH INC: $1,486,269 · Religion+1 more: $15,720 · ReligionUPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC: $986,511 · Community ImprovementLegal Aid Society of Cincinnati: $243,333 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $119,996 · OtherFriars Club Inc: $81,938 · OtherHEALTHY BEGINNINGS INC: $70,600 · OtherCINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION: $52,440 · OtherZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $57,477 · Other+19 more: $237,729 · OtherUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $187,116 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $48,880 · PhilanthropyCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $20,200 · PhilanthropyCINCINNATI BLUE LINE FOUNDATION: $10,068 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $59,796 · Human ServicesCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $43,232 · Human ServicesCOVERD GREATER CINCINNATI: $37,888 · Human ServicesCINCINNATI PRIDE INC: $10,490 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $10,134 · Human Services+1 more: $5,100 · Human ServicesFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $158,459 · Food & Nutrition
Health$25,324,825Religion$1,501,989Community Improvement$986,511Other$863,513Philanthropy$266,264Human Services$166,640Food & Nutrition$158,459

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC: $13,810,786 over 9y, 18% of budgetTRIHEALTH PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE CORP: $8,051,585 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBETHESDA INC: $1,536,352 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetTRIHEALTH INC: $1,486,269 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC: $986,511 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $650,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHealthy Moms & Babes Inc: $421,487 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $272,086 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLegal Aid Society of Cincinnati: $243,333 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI: $202,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $187,116 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $158,459 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCE: $119,996 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $89,083 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFriars Club Inc: $81,938 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetHEALTHY BEGINNINGS INC: $70,600 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC: $70,222 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $59,796 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $57,477 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION: $52,440 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $48,880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $43,232 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetBETHESDA FOUNDATION INC: $40,902 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOVERD GREATER CINCINNATI: $37,888 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $29,814 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCancerFree KIDS: $28,810 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation: $26,220 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetUnited Service Organizations of Central and Southern Ohio Inc: $25,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MATT HAVERKAMP FOUNDATION: $24,155 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $21,672 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $20,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $16,764 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYFIELD EDUCATION & RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,720 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFound House-Interfaith Housing Network: $15,720 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC: $15,234 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI OF SOUTHWEST OHIO: $15,016 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetEaster Seals Tristate: $14,915 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORWINE FOUNDATION INC: $13,125 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $13,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARVIN LEWIS COMMUNITY FUND: $12,585 over 1y, 59% of budgetOVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $10,836 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $10,836 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI PRIDE INC: $10,490 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $10,134 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $10,094 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI BLUE LINE FOUNDATION: $10,068 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetOHIO CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATES: $7,650 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Trihealth IncBethesda Hospital IncThe Greater Cincinnat…Johnson Charitable Gi…United Way of Greater…Carol Ann and Ralph V…John a Schroth Family…L & L Nippert Charita…Duke Energy FoundationJosephine S Russell C…Pfau Charitable Found…Farmer Family Foundat…
Trihealth IncOH75× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Trihealth Inc · Bethesda Hospital Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Duke Energy Foundation · Josephine S Russell Charitable · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Farmer Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home