· Private foundation
The Goldstein Axelman Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN FIRST PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH | $40,140 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA | $18,000 |
| PALS PROGRAMS | $7,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,072 |
| BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND | $5,000 |
| KIDS SMILES | $5,000 |
| THE RENFREW CENTER FOUNDATION | $3,600 |
| WE THE VILLAGE | $3,500 |
| FIGHT TO LEARN PROGRAM | $3,000 |
| SIMON'S HEART | $3,000 |
| MAGIC FOR MADDIE | $2,500 |
| FRIENDS OF OFANIM INC | $1,800 |
| JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| WOLF PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +62% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFChildren First PA5× · 2017–2022 · $69k · revenue +359%
- PPPALS Programs3× · 2021–2024 · $17k · revenue +168%
- KSKIDS SMILES INC4× · 2018–2024 · $17k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- TFTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PHILADELPHIA REGION INCone grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue 0%
- AOATHLETES OF PROMISE INCone grant, 2023 · $5k
- LOLABOR OF LOVE ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Pediatric healthcare, education & research
Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
The mission of the peal center is to educate and empower families to ensure that children, youth and young adults with disabilities and special health care needs lead rich, active lives as full members of their schools and communities.
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pennsylvania Coalition for Oral Health and the most unlike its peers is The Renfrew Center Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Children First PA ↗
- Who funds PALS Programs ↗
- Who funds KIDS SMILES INC ↗
- Who funds THE RENFREW CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PHILADELPHIA REGION INC ↗
- Who funds FIGHT TO LEARN PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
- Who funds SIMON'S FUND ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LIBI INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAGICAL MILA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WE THE VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds MAGIC FOR MADDIE INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY IN MANAYUNK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF OFANIM INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds WOLF PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Temple University Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds GROWING SMILES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH LAW PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PAWS AND AFFECTION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Gordon Charter Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Wawa Foundation Inc · The Snider Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Carp Family Foundation · Tzedakah Foundation · Phillies Charities Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Goldstein Axelman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Goldstein Axelman Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Goldstein Axelman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.