Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Giving Bee Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$80kArts & Culture$73kRecreation & Sports$52kEnvironment$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$38kHealth$36kEducation$34kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $188k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENWICH RIDING & TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC$40,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF GREENWICH INC$25,000
THE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC$25,000
ROUND HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INCORPORATED$20,000
GREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INCORPORATED$15,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CT INC$13,000
GREENWICH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC$10,000
STECHER AND HOROWITZ FOUNDATION$10,000
TALIESIN PRESERVATION INC$10,000
LONG NOW FOUNDATION$10,000
ROUND HILL ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
NATIONAL CHILDRENS BOOK AND LITERACY ALLIANCE INC$7,000
COFFEE FOR GOOD INC$5,000
STAMFORD MUSEUM AND NATURE CENTER INCORPORATED$5,000
ROUND HILL COMMUNITY CHURCH INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NATIONAL CHILDRENS BOOK AND LITERACY ALLIANCE INC: $7k → 8%STANFORD LAW SCHOOL: $10k → 8%LONG NOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%GREENWICH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $10k → 11%STECHER AND HOROWITZ FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%TALIESIN PRESERVATION INC: $10k → 9%GREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INCORPORATED: $15k → 9%STANFORD LAW SCHOOL: $3k → 8%GREENWICH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $8k → 11%STECHER AND HOROWITZ FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%TALIESIN PRESERVATION INC: $10k → 9%GREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INCORPORATED: $8k → 9%STANFORD LAW SCHOOL: $3k → 8%STECHER AND HOROWITZ FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%TALIESIN PRESERVATION INC: $8k → 9%THE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $25k → 9%STANFORD LAW SCHOOL: $2k → 8%STECHER AND HOROWITZ FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%TALIESIN PRESERVATION INC: $3k → 9%THE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $25k → 9%STECHER AND HOROWITZ FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%ROUND HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INCORPORATED: $20k → 9%NYCXD INC: $5k → 17%ROUND HILL ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 9%ROUND HILL COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $5k → 9%THINK GREENWICH INC: $5k → 9%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CT INC: $13k → 9%STAMFORD MUSEUM AND NATURE CENTER INCORPORATED: $5k → 9%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF GREENWICH INC: $50k → 9%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF GREENWICH INC: $25k → 9%COFFEE FOR GOOD INC: $5k → 9%THINK GREENWICH INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$295k · 8 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$295k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-31%
0%

Still filing today

75%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    GREENWICH RIDING & TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $52k · revenue +118%
  • TP
    TALIESIN PRESERVATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $31k · revenue +154%
  • GE
    GREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $23k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • RH
    ROUND HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +28%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue -3%
  • TL
    THE LONG NOW FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenwich Free Library

To provide free library services and computer access to the community.

Education
2
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
3
The Greenwich Tree Conservancy Inc

The greenwich tree conservancy is open to all interested citizens, governed by a board and advised by an advisory board. it was created to preserve and enhance the tree and forest resources of greenwich, ct to benefit the community, its…

Environment
4
Wilton Land Conservation Trust

Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.

Environment
5
Newtown Forest Association Inc

The Newtown Forest Association is the oldest private land trust organization in Connecticut. It has been dedicated for one hundred years to securing for the residents of Newtown and for posterity generally the benefits derived from open…

Environment
6
Greenwich House Inc

Greenwich house responds to the urgent, ongoing, and diverse needs of our community by offering health, human services, education, and arts programs that foster wellness, creativity, and connection.

—
7
Florence Griswold Museum Inc

The florence griswold museum seeks to promote a greater understanding of connecticut's contribution to american art and history through public exhibitions and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
8
Greenwich Historical Society Inc

Greenwich historical society, inc. preserves and interprets greenwich history to strengthen the community's connection to our past, to each other and to our future.

Arts & Culture
9
Westchester Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural environment and resources of Westchester County and eastern Putnam County. The Trust acquires interests in land exhibiting important natural…

Environment
10
Grounds for Sculpture Inc

Grounds For Sculpture combines art and beckoning spaces to welcome, surprise, and engage all visitors in the artists act of invention.

Arts & Culture
11
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
12
Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation

The greenwich village society for historic preservation ("village preservation") preserves the architectural heritage and cultural history of greenwich village, the east village, and noho.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwich Riding & Trails Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF GREENWICH INC: $75,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF GREENWICH INCGREENWICH RIDING & TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC: $51,500 · OtherGREENWICH RIDING & TRAILS ASSOCIATION INCGREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC: $22,500 · OtherGREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INCROUND HILL ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · OtherROUND HILL ASSOCIATION INC+2 more: $10,000 · Other+2 moreTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUS…TALIESIN PRESERVATION INC: $30,500 · EnvironmentTALIESIN PRESERVATION I…THE STECHER AND HOROWITZ FOUNDATION: $37,500 · Arts & CultureTHE STECHER …Stamford Museum & Nature Center Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureStamford Mus…ROUND HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterROUND HILL…Greenwich Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $17,500 · Public Safety & DisasterGreenwich …THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $17,270 · EducationTHE BOARD…THE LONG NOW FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE LONG …THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S BOOK AND LITERACY ALLIANCE: $7,000 · EducationTHE NATIO…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $13,000 · HealthGreenwich Forward INC: $10,000 · Public BenefitCOFFEE FOR GOOD INC: $5,000 · Employment
Other$169,000Environment$80,500Arts & Culture$42,500Public Safety & Disaster$37,500Education$34,270Health$13,000Public Benefit$10,000Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWICH RIDING & TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC: $51,500 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE STECHER AND HOROWITZ FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetTALIESIN PRESERVATION INC: $30,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROUND HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetGreenwich Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $17,270 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LONG NOW FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetStamford Museum & Nature Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNYCXD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOFFEE FOR GOOD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Giving Bee Family FoundationDE22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Giving Bee Family Foundation · MacKenzie Ryan Brumberg Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The John L and Sue Ann Weinberg Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Giving Bee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Giving Bee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Stamford Museum & Nature Center Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Giving Bee Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Giving Bee Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Giving Bee’s filings →

More from the funding graph