Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ginger and Tony Allen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$455kMembership Benefit$85kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$14kFood & Nutrition$10kHousing & Shelter$5kRecreation & Sports$4kEmployment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TROJAN SIG FOUNDATION$15,000
ORANGEWOOD CHILDREN'S FDN$10,000
HUMAN OPTIONS$10,000
KIDWORKS$5,000
BRACKENS KITCHEN$5,000
BOYSGIRLS CLUB CENTRAL OC$5,000
BOYS' HOPEGIRLS' HOPE$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$5,000
HOPE BUILDERS (FKA TALLER SJ)$5,000
ALZHEIMERS ORANGE COUNTY$5,000
SHARE OUR SELVES FOUNDATION$4,000
WEST COAST SPORTS ASSOCIATES$3,000
WORKING WARDROBES$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHARE OUR SELVES FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $10k → 10%KIDWORKS: $5k → 10%MIND OC: $53k → 10%MIND OC: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$535k · 3 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

$535k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEmploymentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $387k · revenue +49%
  • TS
    Trojan Sig Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $85k · revenue +16%
  • MO
    MIND OC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $64k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • BC
    BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orange County Grantmakers

The specific purpose of this corporation is to Orange County Grantmakers is a regional philanthropic serving organization advancing social impact by supporting, strengthening, and building adaptive leadership across the funder and…

Philanthropy
2
Orange Coast College Foundation

Orange Coast College Foundation's mission is to develop sources of support for Orange Coast College to achieve its mission by encouraging gifts of time, treasure, and talent from alumni, community members, faculty, staff, corporations,…

Education
3
People for Irvine Community Health

211OC links Orange County's most vulnerable with the health and human service resources they need. Last year alone, we served over 100,000 requests for help (call/email/in-person/online). Everyone knows someone who needs help. For…

4
Orange County School of the Arts

We provide an unparalleled arts and acdademic education in a creative, challenging and nurturing environment to a diverse student body passionate about the arts, preparing them to reach their highest potential.

Education
5
Western Youth Services

Western Youth Services (WYS) is a community-based nonprofit organization providing prevention and mental health treatment services for youth experiencing emotional and behavioral challenges, as well as their families. Services are…

Human Services
6
Orange County Technology Action Network

Octane connects people and ideas with capital and resources to fuel technology growth in orange county. our members represent orange county technology executive leaders, entrepreneurs, investors, venture capitalists, academicians, and…

Community Improvement
7
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
8
Association of California Cities

To support local control and promote good governance & policy making among orange county leaders.

Education
9
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

10
Human Services Association

The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.

Human Services
11
OroHealth Corporation

To support Oroville Hospital in it's ongoing mission and to ensure the Oroville Community has access to comprehensive health care services now and in the future.

12
West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orange County Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Brackens Kitchen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $386,831 · HealthHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+1 more — $5,000 · HealthTrojan Sig Foundation — $85,000 · PhilanthropyTrojan Sig Found…+1 more — $1,400 · PhilanthropyMIND OC — $63,600 · Human ServicesMIND OCHuman Options Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesHuman Options I…KIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $5,000 · Human ServicesKIDWORKS COMMUN…The Share Our Selves Foundation — $4,000 · Human ServicesBOYSGIRLS CLUB CENTRAL OC — $5,000 · OtherBOYS' HOPEGIRLS' HOPE — $5,000 · OtherHOPE BUILDERS (FKA TALLER SJ) — $5,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $5,000 · OtherBrackens Kitchen Inc — $5,000 · OtherBIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB — $1,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · OtherORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Crime & LegalWorking Wardrobes For A New Start — $3,000 · EmploymentWESTCOAST SPORTS ASSOCIATES INC — $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$391,831Philanthropy$86,400Human Services$82,600Other$27,400Crime & Legal$10,000Employment$3,000Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $386,831 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTrojan Sig Foundation — $85,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetMIND OC — $63,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Options Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB — $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Argyros Family FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Argyros Family Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · Oneoc · Orange County Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ginger and Tony Allen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ginger and Tony Allen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ginger and Tony Allen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph