Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gerald and Reesa Niznick 2012 Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$625k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$351k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$5.1MReligion$646kPhilanthropy$584kInternational$188kHuman Services$176kHealth$41kArts & Culture$17kCivil Rights$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $21k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $253k
  • $250k+1 grant · $351k
$2,750
Median grant
4
States reached
$316k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA$351,370
VALLEY BETH SHALOM$127,655
THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LA$125,150
RMLOW FOUNDATION$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY$5,000
BEIT T'SHUVAH$2,875
FRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS$2,750
CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA$2,500
TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,250
ISRAEL PARASPORT CENTER$513
FREINDS OF THE IDF$472
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND ORG$360
HUNTINGTON DISEASE SOCIETY FOR AMERICA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 27% of grant dollars ($1.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 73% that went abroad ($5.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RMLOW FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%RMPL FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%BEIT T'SHUVAH: $4k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%HANDS IN 4 YOUTHS: $5k → 12%RMLOW FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%RMPL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%BEIT T'SHUVAH: $4k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION: $75k → 14%RMPL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%BEIT T'SHUVAH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION: $75k → 14%BEIT T'SHUVAH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $36k → 14%BEIT T'SHUVAH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $11k → 14%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $3k → 13%TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $3k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $36k → 17%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $3k → 14%USC: $5k → 14%LA JEWISH HOME: $115k → 14%LA JEWISH HOME: $30k → 14%LA JEWISH HOME: $30k → 14%THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE WORLD'S JEWISH MUSEUM: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS: $3k → 14%TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%HESCHEL DAY SCHOOL: $50k → 14%HESCHEL DAY SCHOOL: $25k → 14%HESCHEL DAY SCHOOL: $4k → 14%THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LA: $175k → 14%THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LA: $151k → 14%THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LA: $125k → 14%THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LA: $26k → 14%STAND WITH US: $5k → 14%THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LA: $4k → 14%THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LA: $3k → 14%TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 14%TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 14%VALLEY BETH SHALOM: $425k → 14%VALLEY BETH SHALOM: $128k → 14%VALLEY BETH SHALOM: $25k → 14%VALLEY BETH SHALOM: $16k → 14%VALLEY BETH SHALOM: $12k → 14%VALLEY BETH SHALOM: $9k → 14%VALLEY BETH SHALOM: $7k → 14%VALLEY BETH SHALOM: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
AZ
DC

Beyond the US: 73% of all-years giving ($5.1M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$5.1M · 10 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Gerald and Reesa Niznick 2012 Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Gerald and Reesa Niznick 2012 Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 73% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 20 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
40

Total granted

$6.2M
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+27%

Still filing today

45%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $47k · revenue +67%
  • DT
    DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $22k · revenue +5%
  • BT
    Beit T'Shuvah
    8× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +2%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $36k · revenue +115%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
3
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
4
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
5
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
6
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
8
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
Sherit Isroel
—
11
Clal-the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership Inc

A leading advocate for pluralism and diversity, clal offers jewish wisdom that enhances public life, deepens civic engagement and cultivates personal growth.

Religion
12
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Rmlow Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA: $4,952,825 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MANITOBAVALLEY BETH SHALOM: $625,862 · OtherVALLEY BETH SHALOM+48 more: $600,966 · Other+48 moreJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $484,625 · Philanthropy+2 more: $10,360 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $47,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $36,000 · International+3 more: $10,100 · InternationalDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $21,800 · EducationHarmony Project: $1,500 · EducationTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $12,450 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $3,000 · Health+2 more: $368 · HealthHANDS IN FOR YOUTH INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP DEL CORAZON INC: $2,100 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS INC: $2,750 · EnvironmentUrban Adamah: $1,440 · Environment
Other$6,179,653Philanthropy$494,985International$193,100Education$23,300Health$15,818Recreation & Sports$7,100Environment$4,190

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $484,625 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $47,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $21,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $21,085 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $12,450 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE WORLD'S JEWISH MUSEUM: $11,800 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRMLOW FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS IN FOR YOUTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS INC: $2,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE INC: $2,430 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $2,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP DEL CORAZON INC: $2,100 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHarmony Project: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Adamah: $1,440 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH REPUBLICAN ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTOP CANCER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDON INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE WORLD'S JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds RMLOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HANDS IN FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
  • Who funds CAMP DEL CORAZON INC ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds Urban Adamah ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH REPUBLICAN ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gerald and Reesa Niznick 2012 Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gerald and Reesa Niznick 2012 Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hands in for Youth Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gerald and Reesa Niznick 2012 Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Gerald and Reesa Niznick 2012 Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gerald and Reesa Niznick 2012 Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph