Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George S Bissell Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$769k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$207k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.2MInternational$544kHuman Services$55kYouth Development$21kReligion$21kEmployment$11kArts & Culture$6kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $663k
$22,475
Median grant
9
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANATOLIA COLLEGE$206,666
HIRAM COLLEGE$105,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$100,000
CAMFED USA$100,000
BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL$93,334
TENACRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$58,334
GLOBAL GIVING$23,654
PARTNERS IN ISLAND EDUCATION$22,475
WELLESLEY VILLAGE CHURCH$20,000
AFRICAN COLLABORATION$10,000
PROJECT OF EASTON INC$10,000
ONEGOAL$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,291
CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION HAMMERSTONE SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $11k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $10k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $7k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $6k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $6k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $5k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $4k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $4k → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 17 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$1.8M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+53%

Still filing today

88%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF ANATOLIA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $464k · revenue +74%
  • CU
    CAMFED USA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $271k · revenue +653%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $219k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $34k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • RO
    REACH OUT & READ PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

—
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
12
United Nations International School

Under the auspices of the united nations and guided by its ideals, the united nations international school (unis) provides an inclusive and diverse learning environment in which rigorous international programs foster academic excellence,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Noble and Greenough School; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TRUSTEES OF ANATOLIA COLLEGE: $463,666 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF ANATOLIA COLLEGEHIRAM COLLEGE: $184,500 · EducationHIRAM COLLEGEBRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $159,334 · EducationBRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOLTENACRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL CORPORATION: $150,834 · EducationTENACRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL CORPORATIONNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $40,000 · Education+2 more: $36,000 · EducationCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $271,000 · InternationalCAMFED USA FOUNDATI…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $44,074 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDA…+2 more: $15,000 · InternationalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $219,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN H…Individual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS: $21,000 · OtherWELLESLEY VILLAGE CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,600 · OtherREACH OUT & READ PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 · OtherONEGOAL: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $11,301 · OtherPartners In Island Education Inc: $71,475 · PhilanthropyPROJECT OF EASTON INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesSUMMER SEARCH: $11,000 · Employment
Education$1,084,334International$330,074Health$219,000Other$130,901Philanthropy$71,475Human Services$55,000Employment$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF ANATOLIA COLLEGE: $463,666 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $271,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $219,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHIRAM COLLEGE: $184,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL: $159,334 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTENACRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL CORPORATION: $150,834 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPartners In Island Education Inc: $71,475 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetPROJECT OF EASTON INC: $55,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $44,074 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS: $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLAIR ACADEMY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONEGOAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS: $2,510 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKARL STIRNER ARTS TRAIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF ANATOLIA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HIRAM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TENACRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Partners In Island Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds KARL STIRNER ARTS TRAIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George S Bissell Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George S Bissell Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Vermont Adaptive Ski and Sports: 11% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Blair Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George S Bissell’s filings →

More from the funding graph