Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$740k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$425k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.0MRecreation & Sports$580kHuman Services$500kFood & Nutrition$445kYouth Development$365kHealth$310kReligion$297kEducation$292kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
  • $250k+1 grant · $425k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER$424,750
NORTH WESTERN UNIVERSITY KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT$100,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$70,000
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$45,000
HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES$20,000
THE BOWERY MISSION$15,000
PEACE HOUSE$10,000
ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SALT LAKE CITY$10,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SUMMIT AND WASATCH COUNTIES$10,000
US SKI AND SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION$10,000
CATHEDRAL OF THE MADELEINE$10,000
FRIENDS OF SKI MOUNTAIN MINING HISTORY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROJECT HOME: $15k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $15k → 22%AUTOZONER ASSISTANCE FUND: $20k → 17%Project HOME: $5k → 22%Cradles to Crayons: $125k → 7%PEACE HOUSE: $10k → 5%Cradles to Crayons: $30k → 7%PEACE HOUSE: $10k → 5%Cradles to Crayons: $25k → 7%PEACE HOUSE: $10k → 5%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $25k → 22%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IA
PA
CT
CA
UT
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 26 repeat orgs$316k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
17

Total granted

$4.9M
$291k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+3%

Still filing today

69%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +173%
  • Northwestern University
    8× · 2017–2025 · $650k · revenue +41%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $230k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • SB
    St Brendan Catholic School
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • MB
    Memphis Brooks Museum of Art Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
6
The New School

The new school's mission is to prepare our students to understand, contribute to, and succeed in a rapidly changing society, and thus make the world a better and more just place. (continued on schedule o)

Education
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
10
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
11
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
12
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holy Cross Ministries of Utah; the most unlike its peers is Autozoner Assistance Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $1,994,850 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER+3 more: $41,060 · Arts & CultureST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $207,000 · OtherST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCHUTAH FOOD BANK: $195,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $125,000 · OtherALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATI…CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $110,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESCatholic Relief Services CRS Donor Services: $105,765 · OtherCatholic Relief Services CRS …CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH: $55,000 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SALT LAKE CITY: $55,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $50,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $110,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT COLLEGEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SUMMIT & WASATCH COUNTIES UTAH INC: $50,000 · Other+16 more: $273,000 · Other+16 moreNorthwestern University: $650,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern U…United States Ski Team Foundation: $30,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION: $360,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $230,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME: $35,000 · Human ServicesPeace House Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human ServicesAutozoner Assistance Fund Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $175,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance: $50,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionNAMI Seattle: $125,000 · HealthHoly Cross Ministries of Utah: $40,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$2,035,910Other$1,335,765Recreation & Sports$685,000Youth Development$365,000Human Services$340,000Food & Nutrition$250,000Health$165,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER: $1,994,850 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetNorthwestern University: $650,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION: $360,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $230,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $195,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $175,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Seattle: $125,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $110,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SUMMIT & WASATCH COUNTIES UTAH INC: $50,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHoly Cross Ministries of Utah: $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPeace House Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMemphis Brooks Museum of Art Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNRF FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAutozoner Assistance Fund Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPark City Education Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIMMEL CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Corona Self Help Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP HOBE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTAG RANCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLAGUNA ART MUSEUM: $1,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds NAMI Seattle ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SUMMIT & WASATCH COUNTIES UTAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Holy Cross Ministries of Utah ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
  • Who funds United States Ski Team Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Memphis Brooks Museum of Art Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NRF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Autozoner Assistance Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Park City Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIMMEL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ssir Cares IncUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ssir Cares Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph