Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George and Karen James Family Founda

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MPhilanthropy$124kArts & Culture$67kSocial Science$46kEnvironment$26kYouth Development$25kHealth$21kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REED COLLEGE$25,000
ROSEBACK MUSEUM & LIBRARY$20,000
EVERGLADES SCHOOL$10,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$5,000
ROSEBACK MUSEUM & LIBRARY$1,500
GREENWICH CHAPLAINCY SVC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
NY
MA
OR
WY
PA
CT
CA
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$311k · 16 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +119% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
23

Total granted

$311k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+119%
+27%

Still filing today

56%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthSocial ScienceAnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Bucknell University
    3× · 2019–2021 · $81k · revenue +24%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +243%
  • BS
    BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +19%
  • GE
    GENERATION ENTERPRISE
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • NY
    NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
6
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
7
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
8
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
9
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
10
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Henrys Fork Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
21/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $685,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAREED INSTITUTE: $154,400 · EducationREED INSTITUTEBucknell University: $81,000 · EducationBucknell University+5 more: $49,150 · EducationGREENWICH ACADEMY ANNUAL FUND: $121,000 · OtherGREENWICH ACADEMY AN…THE ROSENBACH MUSIC LIBRARY: $27,000 · OtherTHE ROSENBACH MUSIC …GENERATION ENTERPRISE: $25,000 · OtherGENERATION ENTERPRIS…ROSEBACK MUSEUM & LIBRARY: $21,500 · OtherROSEBACK MUSEUM & LI…CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $16,000 · OtherCENTER FOR THE ARTSTROUT UNLIMITED HEADWATERS: $10,000 · OtherEVERGLADES SCHOOL: $10,000 · Other+22 more: $33,800 · Other+22 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $121,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $25,000 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $21,362 · Social ScienceNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Health+2 more: $750 · HealthNEST INC: $10,000 · InternationalTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $5,000 · AnimalsWILD SALMON CENTER: $1,250 · Animals
Education$969,550Other$264,300Philanthropy$121,000Social Science$46,362Health$20,750International$10,000Animals$6,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $685,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREED INSTITUTE: $154,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $121,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBucknell University: $81,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $28,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $21,362 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC: $8,700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC: $3,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN JUMP START: $2,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetORIGINAL MUSIC WORKSHOP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PAUL'S SCHOOL: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds REED INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEST INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN JUMP START ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ORIGINAL MUSIC WORKSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH CHAPLAINCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George and Karen James Family Founda funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George and Karen James Family Founda. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
  • Pacific House Inc: 46% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Reed Institute: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George and Karen James Family Founda’s filings →

More from the funding graph