Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Genesis Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$236k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$640kHealth$193kReligion$91kInternational$86kHuman Services$76kPhilanthropy$19kFood & Nutrition$11kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$100,000
PINE CREST SCHOOL FOUNDATION$45,000
BOCA RATON REG HOSP FDN$20,000
PAP CORP$10,363
Riverdale Country School$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAV$10,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYNPHOMA SOC$7,500
JEWISH WOMEN INTL$6,000
CHABAD ON CAMPUS$5,000
EMS APPLE TREE FUND$5,000
ST JOSEPHS HEALTH FDN$4,000
IMPACT 100 PBC$3,600
VALLEY CHABAD$2,340
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$1,800
ISRAELI TENNIS CENTER FOUNDATION$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OASIS: $3k → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $5k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
MO
MD
DE
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 24 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
25

Total granted

$1.0M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+13%

Still filing today

46%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesHealthMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $450k · revenue +76%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    4× · 2019–2023 · $44k · revenue +252%
  • EM
    ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • AH
    ATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEMS
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • CU
    COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MED CT
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BR
    BOCA RATON JEWISH CTR
    one grant, 2022 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of the Rambam Medical Center

To promote and support the rambam health care campus-the premier medical center in northern israel.

International
2
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
6
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
7
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
8
Ranney School

Ranney school's mission is to see each student mature with character, confidence and courage. upon graduation, ranney students become tomorrow's leaders, distinguished by their intelligence, ability, social conscience and character. it is…

Education
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Israel-America Academic Exchange

Israel-america academic exchange (iaae) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is todeepen the understanding of israel and the middle east within the international academiccommunity. the organization organizes educational missions and…

International
11
Israel Scholarship Education Foundation

Israel scholarship education foundation's mission is to narrowisrael's socio-economic gap through higher education. its unique methodology combines scholarship support for gifted young people fromdisadvantaged backgrounds with community…

International
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Colonial Road School Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsVolunteer Fire DepartmentsSchool Parent OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…South Asian Cultural and Sp…Food Pantries & AssistanceFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%74%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PINE CREST SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $115,000 · OtherPINE CREST SCHOOL FOUNDATIONSt Josephs Health Foundation — $74,000 · OtherSt Josephs Health FoundationIndividual grant recipient — $61,135 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOCA RATON REG HOSP FDN — $60,000 · OtherBOCA RATON REG HOSP FDNATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEMS — $50,000 · OtherATLANTIC HEALTH SYSTEMSPAP CORP — $35,663 · OtherPAP CORPVALLEY CHABAD INC — $34,920 · OtherVALLEY CHABAD INCCHABAD OF BOCA RATON — $24,118 · Other+33 more — $115,783 · Other+33 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $450,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC — $25,175 · EducationRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $23,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $20,000 · Education+3 more — $6,300 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $43,700 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $23,005 · InternationalISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC — $10,700 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $6,800 · International+1 more — $1,800 · InternationalCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY — $6,000 · Human ServicesOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $3,200 · Human ServicesIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · HealthNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION — $500 · HealthPLAY FOR PINK INC — $5,225 · Crime & LegalBOCA HELPING HANDS INC — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$570,619Education$524,475International$86,005Human Services$9,200Health$6,500Crime & Legal$5,225Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $450,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $43,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC — $25,175 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $23,005 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC — $10,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $6,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Women International — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $5,225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $3,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEDICATED INDIANS OF AMERICA INC — $3,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLONIAL ROAD SCHOOL PTA — $1,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSADDLE RIVER FIRE ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRAMSEY RESCUE SQUAD INC — $350 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRAMSEY AMBULANCE CORPS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAMSEY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY
  • Who funds IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Jewish Women International
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC
  • Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds DEDICATED INDIANS OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Genesis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Ramapo College Foundation1% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Genesis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Genesis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph