Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Genada Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$107kHuman Services$48kArts & Culture$21kRecreation & Sports$13kEnvironment$11kAnimals$11kCommunity Improvement$10kHealth$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$421k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLN ACADEMY$14,800
LINCOLN COUNTY FIELD HOCKEY$12,000
Individual grant recipient$11,500
Individual grant recipient$6,000
DAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,500
DAMARISCOTTA NEWCASTLE LIONS CLUB$500
STEPPING STONES$500
LINCOLN COUNTY TELEVISION$500
EBEMEE SNOWMOBILE CLUB$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TWIN VILLAGES ALLIANCE: $5k → 9%TWIN VILLAGES ALLIANCE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 19 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
12

Total granted

$348k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+2%

Still filing today

37%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LINCOLN ACADEMY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +11%
  • CR
    Coastal Rivers Conservation Trust
    2× · 2017–2018 · $11k · revenue +33%
  • BH
    Bethesda Hospital Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +186%

Funded once

  • BV
    BOOTHBAY V E T S INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • MH
    MILES HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • L
    LINCOLNHEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln County Historical Association

To collect, preserve, and interpret the history of lincoln county, maine, which once extended from brunswick to canada. we are stewards of three historical buildings: the 1761 pownalborough court house in dresden, the 1811 old jail in…

Arts & Culture
2
Protect Maine's Fishing Heritage Foundation
Environment
3
Lincolnville Historical Society

To preserve collect and digitize the archive of the town of Lincolnville Maine's history ecology flora and fauna

Unclassified
4
Bangor Historical Society

Bangor Historical Society's Mission is to share the region's rich history with the community and its visitors through research, education and programs.

—
5
Piscataquog Land Conservancy

The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…

—
6
Sebasticook Regional Land Trust

The mission of the SRLT is to recognize and conserve the rich wild and workinglandscape of Central Maine's Sebasticook River watershed through conservation,stewardship and education. Our focal programs are land conservation for…

Environment
7
Deer Isle Stonington Historical Society

The deer isle-stonington historical society was formed in 1959 with the goal of collecting and preserving historical facts, records and relics pertaining to deer isle, stonington and adjoining communities and islands of east penobscot bay…

Arts & Culture
8
Bath-Brunswick Regional Chamber

Our mission is to be a catalyst for growth and development of our region through collaborative policymaking, eliminating barriers, connecting leaders, promoting prosperity, and welcoming diversity.

Community Improvement
9
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
10
Lake Stewards of Maine - Maine Volunteer Lake Monitoring Program

Facilitate the collection and quality assurance of lake monitoring data gathered from over 500 state of maine lakes

Environment
11
Sandwich Historical Society
Arts & Culture
12
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coastal Rivers Conservation Trust; the most unlike its peers is Damariscotta Pumpkinfest. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $95,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientELDER CARE NETWORK: $48,000 · OtherELDER CARE NETWORKIndividual grant recipient: $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLINCOLN COUNTY FIELD HOCKEY: $12,000 · OtherBOOTHBAY V E T S INC: $10,000 · OtherSKIDOMPHA LIBRARY: $8,000 · Other+20 more: $29,500 · Other+20 moreLINCOLN ACADEMY: $95,300 · EducationLINCOLN ACADEMYDAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $17,000 · Arts & CultureFRANCES PERKINS CENTER: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCoastal Rivers Conservation Trust: $11,000 · EnvironmentTWIN VILLAGES ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Human ServicesNAMI MAINE: $3,000 · HealthDAMARISCOTTA PUMPKINFEST: $650 · Recreation & Sports
Other$239,550Education$95,300Arts & Culture$18,000Environment$11,000Human Services$10,000Health$3,000Recreation & Sports$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLINCOLN ACADEMY: $95,300 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $17,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCoastal Rivers Conservation Trust: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTWIN VILLAGES ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetBethesda Hospital Foundation Inc: $3,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI MAINE: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Mid-Maine: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRANCES PERKINS CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEBEEMEE SNOWMOBILE CLUB: $750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDAMARISCOTTA PUMPKINFEST: $650 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLINCOLN COUNTY TELEVISION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBATH AREA FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEWCASTLE FIRE COMPANY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LINCOLN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DAMARISCOTTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Coastal Rivers Conservation Trust ↗
  • Who funds TWIN VILLAGES ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Bethesda Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MAINE ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLNHEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mid-Maine ↗
  • Who funds FRANCES PERKINS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EBEEMEE SNOWMOBILE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds DAMARISCOTTA PUMPKINFEST ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN COUNTY TELEVISION ↗
  • Who funds BATH AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NEWCASTLE FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds NOBLEBORO HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reny Charitable FoundationME24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reny Charitable Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Marjorie C Bailey Charitable Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Genada Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Genada Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Genada Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Genada Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Genada’s filings →

    More from the funding graph