Skip to content
The Gcagr Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Gcagr Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$73kHealth$29kReligion$11kAnimals$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$1kYouth Development$1k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$383k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY$3,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,000
SAINT MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$3,000
VISUALLY IMPAIRED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC$2,500
TWISTED PINK$2,000
IMPACT100 LOUISVILLE INC$1,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%LITTLE WAY PREGNACY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 15%LITTLE WAY PREGNACY RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115k · 8 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$115k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+208%

Still filing today

63%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VI
    VISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +2%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +78%
  • TP
    Twisted Pink Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +466%

Funded once

  • V(
    VIPS (VISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES)
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • LM
    LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +208%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INC: $24,000 · OtherST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INCSACRED HEART SCHOOLS INC: $22,000 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLS INCVISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC: $20,500 · OtherVISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INCSAINT MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC COMMUNITY: $11,000 · OtherSAINT MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC COMMUNITYVIPS (VISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES): $5,000 · OtherVIPS (VISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES)+2 more: $2,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $18,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…Twisted Pink Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTwisted P…IMPACT100 LOUISVILLE INC: $1,100 · PhilanthropyIMPACT100…KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $7,000 · AnimalsLOUISVILLE METRO POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalLITTLE WAY PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human Services
Other$84,500Health$18,500Philanthropy$11,100Animals$7,000Crime & Legal$5,000Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC: $20,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $18,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTwisted Pink Inc: $10,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISVILLE METRO POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLITTLE WAY PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Twisted Pink Inc ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE WAY PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT100 LOUISVILLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The Community Foundat…Norton Healthcare IncThe Community Foundat…Baird Foundation IncNatl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository IncKY15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Norton Healthcare Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gcagr Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gcagr Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gcagr Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Gcagr Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gcagr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home