Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gary & Diane Heavin Community Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$5.1MHealth$1.9MCivil Rights$1.2MFood & Nutrition$1.1MHuman Services$973kArts & Culture$950kPhilanthropy$540kYouth Development$390kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $272k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $922k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LORD'S WORK INC$350,000
CHRIST THE KING CHURCH$210,000
LIFELINE CHRISTIAN MISSION$140,000
Individual grant recipient$106,526
MISSION WACO$95,000
IGNITED CHURCH$60,000
FRIENDS FOR LIFE$60,000
AMERICAN FAMILY RADIO$50,000
DISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED$50,000
LEGACY GLOBAL FOUNDATION$50,000
AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION$50,000
COUNCIL FOR LIFE CENTRAL TEXAS$50,000
EAGLE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$43,572
GATESVILLE CARE CENTER$25,000
GREAT TEXAS BALLOON RACE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEEMA HOUSE: $10k → 9%ARCHWAY OF HOPE: $15k → 16%ARCHWAY OF HOPE: $15k → 16%ARCHWAY OF HOPE: $10k → 16%ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $10k → 16%ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $10k → 16%ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $5k → 16%ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $5k → 16%ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $5k → 16%ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $5k → 16%ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $5k → 16%ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
NY
MA
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 54 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

54 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
63

Total granted

$13M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+34%

Still filing today

37%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $174k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $813k · revenue +161%
  • FF
    FRIENDS FOR LIFE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $665k · revenue +105%
  • BF
    BALLOON FEDERATION OF AMERICA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $164k · revenue +120% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • CM
    CORYELL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
5
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
6
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

7
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
8
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
9
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
10
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
11
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

12
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Christian Mission and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity College Foundatio…Animal Rescue and ShelterPregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%12%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%61%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/57
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,508

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
27/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lifeline Christian Mission — $1,821,078 · OtherLifeline Christian MissionNATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE — $1,100,000 · OtherNATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFEIndividual grant recipient — $1,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $990,996 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN FAMILY RADIO — $847,500 · OtherAMERICAN FAMILY RADIOAUSTIN HEALTH — $673,742 · OtherAUSTIN HEALTHTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF INDIA 1 TRUPTI SADAN SOCIETY — $660,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF INDIA 1 TRUPTI SADAN SOCIETY+103 more — $4,828,945 · Other+103 moreMISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC — $812,500 · ReligionMISSION WACO…THE LORDS WORK INC — $700,000 · ReligionTHE LORDS WO…AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FAM…FUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE — $72,500 · Religion+2 more — $45,000 · ReligionFRIENDS FOR LIFE — $665,000 · HealthFaith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center — $100,000 · Health+3 more — $27,300 · HealthCONSUMER WELLNESS CENTER INC — $660,000 · AnimalsLEGACY GLOBAL FOUNDATION — $150,000 · PhilanthropyTRINITY OAKS ENTERPRISES — $57,875 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY — $47,500 · Human ServicesARCHWAY OF HOPE — $40,000 · Human ServicesTogether For Good Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY ABUSE CENTER INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesNEEMA HOUSE USA INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesDISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED INC — $150,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$11,922,261Religion$1,730,000Health$792,300Animals$660,000Philanthropy$207,875Human Services$182,500Crime & Legal$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLifeline Christian Mission — $1,821,078 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetMISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC — $812,500 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetTHE LORDS WORK INC — $700,000 over 2y, 95% of budgetFRIENDS FOR LIFE — $665,000 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetCONSUMER WELLNESS CENTER INC — $660,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetBALLOON FEDERATION OF AMERICA — $163,565 over 8y, 29% of budgetDISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED INC — $150,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetLEGACY GLOBAL FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGatesville Care Center — $140,000 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC — $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFaith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center — $100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE — $72,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetRICK CAYWOOD MINISTRIES — $70,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetGREAT TEXAS BALLOON RACE INC — $69,500 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetTRINITY OAKS ENTERPRISES — $57,875 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $50,000 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetTHE ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY — $47,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetARCHWAY OF HOPE — $40,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWALDEN DYNAMICS INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMAQOR MINISTRIES — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTogether For Good Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFOR THE CHILDREN — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHEWITT LIONS CLUB — $20,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF WACO INC — $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFAMILY ABUSE CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGOOD360 — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEEMA HOUSE USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCharis Hills Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetStamp Out Starvation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetNATIONAL BALLOON CLASSIC LTD — $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget24 HOURS FOR HANK INC — $4,800 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMARBLE FALLS ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVICTORY JUNCTION GANG CAMP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lifeline Christian Mission
  • Who funds MISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC
  • Who funds THE LORDS WORK INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR LIFE
  • Who funds CONSUMER WELLNESS CENTER INC
  • Who funds BALLOON FEDERATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds DISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds LEGACY GLOBAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Gatesville Care Center
  • Who funds AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Faith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center
  • Who funds PRO-LIFE WACO
  • Who funds FUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clifton FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clifton Foundation · United Way of Waco-McLennan County · Baylor University · Waco Foundation · Painted River Foundation · Fm and Gloria Young Family Foundation · Margaret Cb & S Spencer N Brown Foundation Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Shell USA Company Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gary & Diane Heavin Community Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gary & Diane Heavin Community Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The Gary & Diane Heavin Community Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 131 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph