· Private foundation
The Garchik Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $260k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Boca Raton Regional Hospital | $200,000 |
| Lynn University | $60,000 |
| Johns Hopkins University | $30,000 |
| Found for Defense of Democracies | $25,000 |
| Love Serving Autism | $10,000 |
| BLOOM Here Inc | $10,000 |
| Friends of the IDF | $10,000 |
| Autism Speaks | $10,000 |
| Our Minds Matter | $10,000 |
| US Holocaust Memorial Museum | $10,000 |
| Breast Cancer Research Foundation | $7,500 |
| Selfhelp Community Services | $5,000 |
| United Hatzalah | $5,000 |
| Kavod | $5,000 |
| Ruth and Normal Rales Jewish Serv | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -25% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BRBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc5× · 2020–2025 · $530k · revenue +44%
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +42%- LULYNN UNIVERSITY INC2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- TCThe Charlie Fundone grant, 2024 · $10k
- PBPalm Beach County Food Bank Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +50%
- AGAMERICA GIVES INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…
Prim&r advances the highest ethical standards in the conduct of biomedical, behavioral and social science research. prim&r accomplishes this mission through education, membership services, professional certification, public policy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Selfhelp Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nextgen Stem Fellowship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CROSSROADS EDUCATORS INC ↗
- Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LYNN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds OUR MINDS MATTER ↗
- Who funds BLOOM HERE INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE SERVING AUTISM INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds KAVOD ↗
- Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds SIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR BEHAVIOR AND HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds GIFFORDS ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Nextgen Stem Fellowship Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING INC ↗
- Who funds SONG FOR CHARLIE INC ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP GREATER WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds PAVE INC DBA PARENTS AMPLIFYING VOICES IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds HORTON'S KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Women Giving Back Inc ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ALLIES INC ↗
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · New Venture Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Garchik Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- Center for Child Counseling Inc — 8% of income from government
- Civic Life Project Inc — 7% of income from government
- Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc — 0% of income from government
- Lynn University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.