Skip to content
The Gallogly Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Gallogly Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2021
21
Grants FY2021
8
States reached
$415k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of The Gallogly Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Nature Conservancy, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Gallogly Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 17 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18
18
’19
21
’20
17
’21
18
’22
16
’23
10
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$6.0MHealth$2.7MCrime & Legal$2.0MEducation$695kCivil Rights$580kFood & Nutrition$123kAnimals$73kPhilanthropy$66kOther$0
02FY2021 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $321k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $423k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$28,750
Median grant
8
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Nature Conservancy$415,000
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center$400,000
Northeast Wilderness Trust$400,000
Western NY Land Conservancy$200,000
Equal Justice Center$57,500
Blue Ridge Leal Services$57,500
ACLU of Ohio Foundation Inc$57,500
CASA of Travis County$50,000
The Arbor School$30,000
Tzedek DC$28,750
Ayuda$28,750
Carecen$28,750
Texas Riogrande Legal Aid Inc$27,500
Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem$27,500
Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition$27,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Pikes Peak Hospice Foundation: $10k → 9%Pikes Peak Hospice Foundation: $10k → 9%Pikes Peak Hospice Foundation: $10k → 9%Pikes Peak Hospice Foundation: $5k → 9%Ayuda: $29k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
MT
IL
NY
OH
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of The Gallogly Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Gallogly Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 31 repeat orgs$856k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2021, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
16

Total granted

$7.3M
$478k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+15%

Still filing today

77%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalCivil RightsEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION
    4× · 2019–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +677%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $360k · revenue +58%
  • TA
    THE ARBOR SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $210k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • TF
    The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • FF
    Feedmore Foundation of Western NY
    one grant, 2020 · $64k
  • UNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue -38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
Legal Aid of Northwest Texas

Ensure equal access to justice and improve the lives of low-income communities by providing high-quality legal representation, strategic litigation, valuable legal advice, and meaningful collaborations, outreach, and community education.

Crime & Legal
3
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
4
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
5
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
6
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
7
Central California Legal Services Inc

Central california legal services is a private, not-for-profit, public interest law firm established for the purpose of providing free civil legal assistance to low-income individuals, families, organizations and communities.

Crime & Legal
8
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
9
Volunteer Legal Advocates

To advocate for domestic violence victims, at-risk children, and other vulnerable individuals by providing over $22.8m in pro bono legal services, social service referrals, and on-going support; to train and support a strong network of…

Housing & Shelter
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Alaska Foundation

The aclu of alaska is a non-partisan organization dedicated to advancing the cause of civil liberties in alaska through public education and legal action.

Civil Rights
11
Legal Aid of Western Ohio Inc

Legal aid of western ohio, inc. (lawo) is a non-profit law firm that champions equity and justice through client-centered community collaboration and transformative legal advocacy.

Crime & Legal
12
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Legal Services; the most unlike its peers is Covenant House Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
40/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,165,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: $2,675,000 · OtherThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterWestern NY Land Conservancy: $360,000 · Other+22 more: $1,123,115 · Other+22 moreNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION: $1,150,000 · EnvironmentNORTHEAST WIL…THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $150,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVAT…The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $100,000 · EnvironmentThe Finger La…AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Environment+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentTEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID INC: $195,000 · Crime & LegalTEXAS RIOG…CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION: $195,000 · Crime & LegalCAPITAL AR…COLORADO LEGAL SERVICES: $167,500 · Crime & LegalCOLORADO L…BLUE RIDGE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $115,000 · Crime & LegalBLUE RIDGE…LEGAL ASSISTANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $110,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL ASSI…KIND INC: $110,000 · Crime & LegalKIND INCLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $55,000 · Crime & LegalTHE COMMUNITY FIRM: $55,000 · Crime & Legal+6 more: $153,125 · Crime & Legal+6 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $360,000 · EducationTHE ARBOR SCHOOL: $210,000 · EducationMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC: $30,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC: $115,000 · Civil RightsEqual Justice Center: $115,000 · Civil RightsTOWARDS JUSTICE OF COLORADO: $112,500 · Civil RightsACLU Foundation of Texas Inc: $110,000 · Civil RightsMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $55,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · Civil RightsNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $20,000 · Civil RightsAYUDA INC: $112,500 · Human ServicesPIKES PEAK HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $20,000 · Human ServicesAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $65,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $6,000 · Animals
Other$8,323,115Environment$1,480,000Crime & Legal$1,155,625Education$610,000Civil Rights$555,000Human Services$182,500Animals$71,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,165,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION: $1,150,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $360,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARBOR SCHOOL: $210,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $200,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID INC: $195,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION: $195,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOLORADO LEGAL SERVICES: $167,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $115,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC: $115,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetEqual Justice Center: $115,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetTOWARDS JUSTICE OF COLORADO: $112,500 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetCENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $112,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetAYUDA INC: $112,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLEGAL ASSISTANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $110,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKIND INC: $110,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACLU Foundation of Texas Inc: $110,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE ELDERLY: $55,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FIRM: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $55,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPIKES PEAK HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY: $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCare and Share Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $29,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTZEDEK DC INC: $28,750 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER: $27,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $27,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA INDIAN LEGAL SERVICES INC: $27,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetROOT & REBOUND: $27,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetOKLAHOMA LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $27,500 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $14,375 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNIAGARA FALLS BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Equal Justice WorksLegal Services Corpor…The Skadden FoundationEugene & Agnes E Meye…The Sidley Austin Fou…The Morris and Gwendo…The Denver FoundationThe District of Colum…Equal Justice America…Greater Washington Co…Venable Foundation IncSt David's Foundation
Equal Justice WorksDC34.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Equal Justice Works · Legal Services Corporation · The Skadden Foundation · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · The Sidley Austin Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The District of Columbia Bar Foundation · Equal Justice America Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Venable Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gallogly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gallogly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gallogly Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home