Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gabrielle B Reynolds Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$172kHealth$101kRecreation & Sports$77kAnimals$62kPublic Benefit$45kReligion$22kHuman Services$20kInternational$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $52k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$992k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL ABILITIES SPORTS NKY$22,000
THE SUMMIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$20,000
WHITEFIELD ACADEMY$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY$8,600
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NATIONAL FIRST LADIES LIBRARY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BEST POINT EDUCATION & BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $20k → 16%The Children's Home: $10k → 16%The Children's Home: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IN
OH
PA
CA
KY
AR
TN
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Gabrielle B Reynolds Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 51% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 47%.

The Gabrielle B Reynolds Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 16 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$429k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+34%

Still filing today

44%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationHealthAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI
    5× · 2017–2021 · $62k · revenue +41%
  • TC
    The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio
    3× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +44%
  • HA
    HARDING ACADEMY
    3× · 2018–2021 · $25k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EQUESTRIAN SPORTSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +180%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • PC
    PORTMAN CENTER FOR POLICY SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The York School

York school is an award-winning, private, coed college-prep school for grades 8-12, that develops confident and authentic leaders. we offer an academically challenging experiential program for bright, kind, and driven students in an…

Education
2
The Seven Hills School

Seven hills engages hearts and minds, guiding students to cultivate their unique capacities and preparing each for a meaningful role in a rapidly changing world.

Education
3
The Seven Hills School

The institution provides educational instruction and activities to students ranging from preschool through 8th grade.

—
4
Cincinnati Christian Schools Inc

Cincinnati christian schools, partnering with christian families, provides a bible-centered, quality educational program to equip, train, and disciple students to follow christ and impact culture.

Education
5
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
6
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
7
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
8
Catholic Education Foundation Inc

The catholic education foundation is dedicated to the growth and vitality of catholic education in the archdiocese of louisville. the foundation advances its mission primarily through tuition assistance grants to families who cannot afford…

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

—
11
Cherry Hills Christian School

Cherry Hills Christian School awakens the educational experience by preparing students to live fully for God in a rapidly changing world, knowing they are His masterpieces, uniquely designed for His purpose.

Education
12
Heritage Hall School Inc

To inspire in each child the curiosity to learn, the self-confidence to lead and the compassion to serve.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Educational Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southern California Equestrian Sports. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMMIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL US CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $80,000 · OtherSUMMIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL US CATHOLIC CONFERENCEALL ABILITIES SPORTS NKY LLC: $40,519 · OtherALL ABILITIES SPORTS NKY LLCRide Cincinnati: $30,000 · OtherRide CincinnatiEmory University - ADRC: $27,500 · OtherEmory University - ADRCUniversity of NC Rams Club: $20,000 · OtherUniversity of NC Rams ClubWHITEFIELD ACADEMY INC: $20,000 · OtherWHITEFIELD ACADEMY INCWOODMONT CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherSisters of Notre Dame de Namur: $11,000 · Other+11 more: $67,600 · Other+11 moreZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $62,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SO…THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationTHE GEORGE …HARDING ACADEMY: $25,000 · EducationHARDING ACA…NATIONAL FIRST LADIES LIBRARY: $2,500 · EducationThe Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio: $40,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EQUESTRIAN SPORTS: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC: $8,600 · Recreation & SportsVilla Hills Longhorns Athletic Association Inc: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsST MARY'S FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthBEECHWOOD HOME: $500 · HealthCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $9,800 · Arts & CultureCISE: $7,500 · Religion
Other$311,619Animals$62,000Education$52,500Human Services$40,000Recreation & Sports$36,100Health$10,500Arts & Culture$9,800Religion$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $62,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EQUESTRIAN SPORTS: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARDING ACADEMY: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWHITEFIELD ACADEMY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $9,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCISE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FIRST LADIES LIBRARY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVilla Hills Longhorns Athletic Association Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBEECHWOOD HOME: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EQUESTRIAN SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARDING ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds WHITEFIELD ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds CISE ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FIRST LADIES LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Villa Hills Longhorns Athletic Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEECHWOOD HOME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gabrielle B Reynolds Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gabrielle B Reynolds Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gabrielle B Reynolds’ filings →

    More from the funding graph