Skip to content

· Private foundation

The G2 R2 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$305kReligion$91kHealth$42kYouth Development$6kHuman Services$4kInternational$3kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$659k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
XAVIER UNIVERSITY$20,000
AMERICA'S RIVER ROOTS EXPERIENCE$15,000
CHRIST THE KING CHURCH$10,000
HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION$10,000
ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
CINCINNATI ART MUSEUM$10,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL-NICU$5,000
LINDER CENTER OF HOPE$5,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
KENZIES CLOSET$2,500
KAREN KARNS FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KAREN CARNS FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%KAREN KARNS FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $3k → 16%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $1k → 16%KENZIE'S CLOSET: $3k → 16%KENZIES CLOSET: $3k → 16%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$481k · 13 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$481k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+15%

Still filing today

31%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • XU
    XAVIER UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue +24%
  • CC
    CINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +97%
  • KC
    KENZIE'S CLOSET
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Childrens Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +71%
  • SU
    ST URSULA ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • LY
    LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati children's hospital medical center will be the leader in improving child health. cincinnati children's will provide child health and transform delivery of care through fully integrated, globally recognized research, education,…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
6
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
7
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
8
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
11
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
12
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Museum Association; the most unlike its peers is America's River Roots Experience. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST THE KING CHURCH: $88,000 · OtherCHRIST THE KING CHURCHST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INC: $53,000 · OtherST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INCLINDER CENTER OF HOPE: $35,000 · OtherLINDER CENTER OF HOPESUMMIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL US CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $25,000 · OtherSUMMIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL US CATHOLIC CONFERENCEST VINCENT DE PAUL: $20,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST ANTHONY OF PADUA CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $28,000 · Other+7 moreXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $185,000 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITYCINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthThe Childrens Hospital: $7,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthAMERICA'S RIVER ROOTS EXPERIENCE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $1,000 · Arts & CultureHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesKENZIE'S CLOSET: $5,700 · Human ServicesKAREN CARNS FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $2,500 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesLAMMERMEIER FOUNDATION: $2,500 · International
Other$274,000Education$185,000Health$37,500Arts & Culture$26,000Human Services$24,700International$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $185,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICA'S RIVER ROOTS EXPERIENCE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Childrens Hospital: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENZIE'S CLOSET: $5,700 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetKAREN CARNS FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMMERMEIER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S RIVER ROOTS EXPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Hospital ↗
  • Who funds KENZIE'S CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds KAREN CARNS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LAMMERMEIER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johnson Charitable Gift FundOH15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Farmer Family Foundation · Robert H & Susan F Castellini Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The G2 R2 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The G2 R2 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The G2 R2 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The G2 R2 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on G2 R2’s filings →

    More from the funding graph