Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Furr Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$730kReligion$90kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kHealth$5kAnimals$3kHuman Services$3kEmployment$3kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$921k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE PREPARATORY ACADEMY$20,000
ARLINGTON BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$8,000
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY$7,000
OKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY$7,000
DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$6,000
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$4,000
FUSION ACADEMY$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND$4,000
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$3,000
ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
PIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE$3,000
WEATHERFORD COLLEGE$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$3,000
CADDO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,000
CENTRAL BIBLE CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
AR
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$670k · 25 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
34

Total granted

$670k
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+2%

Still filing today

24%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    ARLINGTON BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +53%
  • DB
    DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue +33%
  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • GA
    GENERAL ASSEMBLY CORP CODING
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • LS
    LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2021 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
2
Southwest Baptist University

Christ-centered, caring academic community preparing students to be servant leaders in a global society; a higher-education institution offering courses that lead to both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education
3
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
4
Biola University Inc

Biola university is a private christian university located in southern california. for over 116 years, biola has stood out as an institution grounded on biblically centered education, intentional spiritual development, and career…

Education
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
7
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
8
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
9
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hardin-Simmons University; the most unlike its peers is Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $142,000 · OtherGRACE PREPARATORY ACADEMYFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF ARLINGTON: $33,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF ARLINGTONTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $33,000 · OtherTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITYOKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY: $32,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA UNIVERSITYOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF SAN ANTONIO: $27,263 · OtherAUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20,200 · Other+43 more: $198,967 · Other+43 moreHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $154,000 · EducationHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITYARLINGTON BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · EducationARLINGTON BAPTIST UNIVERSITYDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $33,000 · EducationDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITYTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · Education+5 more: $21,000 · Education+5 moreVIKTOR FRANKL INSTITUTE OF LOGOTHERAPY: $5,000 · HealthEOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human Services
Other$566,930Education$270,000Health$5,000Human Services$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $154,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetARLINGTON BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $33,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENDRIX COLLEGE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIKTOR FRANKL INSTITUTE OF LOGOTHERAPY: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HENDRIX COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VIKTOR FRANKL INSTITUTE OF LOGOTHERAPY ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EOD WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Je and le Mabee Foundation IncTX15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Furr Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Furr Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Furr Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Furr Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Furr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph