Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Furr Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$161k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Education$199kReligion$36kFood & Nutrition$3kPhilanthropy$3kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$500Arts & Culture$450Health$450Other$0
02FY2022 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k13 grants · $7k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $161k
$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECU EDUCTION FOUNDATION$160,751
CEDARS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,750
ST MARYS OF THE HILLS$1,100
CHAPEL OF THE CROSS$650
EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT$500
PORCH$300
BLOWING ROCK ART AND HISTORY MUSEUM$250
ACTBLUE$250
GOODFELLOWS$200
HUNGER & HEALTH COALITION$200
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE$100
UNC HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$100
DUKE CANCER CENTER$100
ROTARY CLUB$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $800) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 17%NEW HORIZONS: $100 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
VA
TN
NC
OK
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 69% of The Furr Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in NC; by stated purpose, 30%.

The Furr Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 8 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +177% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
32

Total granted

$68k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+177%
+26%

Still filing today

13%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    ECU EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $33k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S PARISH
    3× · 2019–2021 · $20k
  • CO
    CHAPEL OF THE CROSS
    2× · 2020–2022 · $8k

Funded once

  • CE
    CEDARS EMPLOYEE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • BR
    BLOWING ROCK VILLAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • SP
    ST PETER'S PARISH
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
2
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
4
Johnston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Johnston health foundation seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people in our communities by supporting the patients, programs, and services of unc health johnston. the foundation seeks to be a philanthropic leader and…

—
5
Loudoun Hunger Relief Inc

Loudoun hunger relief is committed to eliminating food insecurity by providing access to nutritious food, building community connections, and expanding educational opportunities.

Religion
6
World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International
7
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
8
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
9
Feeding Avery Families Inc

Provide food at no cost to hungry people in need in avery county, nc and improve their health where possible

Food & Nutrition
10
Hospice & Palliative Care Charlotte Region

Our mission is to relieve suffering and improve the quality and dignity of life through compassionate hospice care at the end of life, palliative care for those with advanced illness, and through community education.

Human Services
11
Table Ministries Inc

Table delivers healthy food and provides nutrition education to food insecure children living in orange county, nc to support their accessibility and knowledge of healthy food and eating habits.

Human Services
12
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Episcopal Relief and Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ECU EDUCTION FOUNDATION: $160,751 · OtherECU EDUCTION FOUNDATIONECU EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $33,055 · OtherECU EDUCATION FOUNDATIONST MARY'S PARISH: $20,353 · OtherST MARY'S PARISHCHAPEL OF THE CROSS: $8,170 · Other+36 more: $16,645 · Other+36 moreTHE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC: $2,650 · Food & NutritionPORCH INC: $300 · Food & NutritionPORCH-Durham: $250 · Food & NutritionEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $200 · Human ServicesNEW HORIZONS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $100 · Human ServicesZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION: $575 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $100 · EducationTHE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM: $250 · Arts & CultureST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 · HealthBLOWING ROCK COMMUNITY FOUNDAT INC: $100 · PhilanthropyQUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC: $80 · Philanthropy
Other$238,974Food & Nutrition$3,200Human Services$800Education$675Arts & Culture$250Health$250Philanthropy$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC: $2,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION: $575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORCH INC: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORCH-Durham: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOWING ROCK COMMUNITY FOUNDAT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds ZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds PORCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PORCH-Durham ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOWING ROCK COMMUNITY FOUNDAT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC11.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Furr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Furr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Furr Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Furr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Furr’s filings →

More from the funding graph