Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Furr Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$161k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192022.

Education$199kReligion$36kFood & Nutrition$3kPhilanthropy$3kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$500Arts & Culture$450Health$450Other$0
02FY2022 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k13 grants · $7k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $161k
$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECU EDUCTION FOUNDATION$160,751
CEDARS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,750
ST MARYS OF THE HILLS$1,100
CHAPEL OF THE CROSS$650
EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT$500
PORCH$300
ACTBLUE$250
BLOWING ROCK ART AND HISTORY MUSEUM$250
HUNGER & HEALTH COALITION$200
GOODFELLOWS$200
DUKE CANCER CENTER$100
UNC HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$100
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE$100
ROTARY CLUB$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $800) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EPISCOPAL RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 17%NEW HORIZONS: $100 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
VA
TN
NC
OK
MS
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 69% of The Furr Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 30% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Furr Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$68k · 8 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +177% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
32

Total granted

$68k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+177%
+14%

Still filing today

13%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    ECU EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $33k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S PARISH
    3× · 2019–2021 · $20k
  • CO
    CHAPEL OF THE CROSS
    2× · 2020–2022 · $8k

Funded once

  • CE
    CEDARS EMPLOYEE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • SP
    ST PETER'S PARISH
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • BR
    BLOWING ROCK VILLAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
2
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
4
Johnston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Johnston health foundation seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people in our communities by supporting the patients, programs, and services of unc health johnston. the foundation seeks to be a philanthropic leader and…

5
Loudoun Hunger Relief Inc

Loudoun hunger relief is committed to eliminating food insecurity by providing access to nutritious food, building community connections, and expanding educational opportunities.

Religion
6
World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International
7
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
8
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
9
Feeding Avery Families Inc

Provide food at no cost to hungry people in need in avery county, nc and improve their health where possible

Food & Nutrition
10
Hospice & Palliative Care Charlotte Region

Our mission is to relieve suffering and improve the quality and dignity of life through compassionate hospice care at the end of life, palliative care for those with advanced illness, and through community education.

Human Services
11
Table Ministries Inc

Table delivers healthy food and provides nutrition education to food insecure children living in orange county, nc to support their accessibility and knowledge of healthy food and eating habits.

Human Services
12
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Episcopal Relief and Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ECU EDUCTION FOUNDATION — $160,751 · OtherECU EDUCTION FOUNDATIONECU EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $33,055 · OtherECU EDUCATION FOUNDATIONST MARY'S PARISH — $20,353 · OtherST MARY'S PARISHCHAPEL OF THE CROSS — $8,170 · Other+36 more — $16,645 · Other+36 moreTHE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC — $2,650 · Food & NutritionPORCH INC — $300 · Food & NutritionPORCH-Durham — $250 · Food & NutritionEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $200 · Human ServicesNEW HORIZONS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $100 · Human ServicesZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION — $575 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $100 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $250 · HealthTHE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM — $250 · Arts & CultureBLOWING ROCK COMMUNITY FOUNDAT INC — $100 · PhilanthropyQUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC — $80 · Philanthropy
Other$238,974Food & Nutrition$3,200Human Services$800Education$675Health$250Arts & Culture$250Philanthropy$180

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC — $2,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION — $575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORCH INC — $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORCH-Durham — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOWING ROCK COMMUNITY FOUNDAT INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUNGER AND HEALTH COALITION INC
  • Who funds ZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds PORCH INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds PORCH-Durham
  • Who funds THE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC11.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Furr Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Furr Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Furr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph