· Public charity
The Fund for Change Inc
See schedule othe foundation was created to carry out the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the associated jewish community federation of baltimore, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $704k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FUSION PARTNERSHIPS INC | $50,000 |
| UNITED WORKERS ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY LAW CENTER | $50,000 |
| MARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK | $42,500 |
| NO BOUNDARIES COALITION | $40,000 |
| PARITY BALTIMORE INC | $35,000 |
| MARYLAND PESTICIDE EDUCATION NETWORK INC | $30,000 |
| BALT | $30,000 |
| ECONOMIC ACTION MD | $30,000 |
| PUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER | $30,000 |
| JEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE | $28,875 |
| BLACK GIRLS VOTE 4 H E R INC | $25,000 |
| MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK | $25,000 |
| HOMELESS PERSONS REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PJPUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC5× · 2020–2024 · $225k · revenue +28%
- MPMARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK5× · 2020–2024 · $221k · revenue +60%
NO BOUNDARIES COALITION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $179k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- SCSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INCone grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +42%
- NCNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG DEPENDENCE INCone grant, 2023 · $18k
- BNBALTIMORE NEIGHBORHOODS INCone grant, 2020 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The council was organized for the purpose of providing its members with adequate representation in various union related matters.
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
Disability Rights Maryland (DRM) is the only non-profit organization exclusively focused on providing free legal advocacy services to people with all types of disabilities, of all ages and in all settings, statewide.
Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.
Civil justice is a non-profit organization dedicated to expanding legal services for low and moderate-income marylanders facing life-altering legal issues, using innovative solutions that create positive change.
Inspire volunteerism and connect motivated people and businesses to nonprofit organizations leading to stronger communities. our programs connect the right people with the right organizations.
Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…
To educate the community on the adverse conditions under which they are living and propose various methods of alleviating conditions by conducting public forums and publishing studies.
To provide free mediation services in the baltimore metropolitan area for the purposes of reducing interpersonal and community violence. the program also provides community education and conflict resolution training.
To advance community mediation in Maryland through educating the public, providing training and quality assurance, conducting research and creatively applying mediation to social challenges.
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
Maryland new directions' mission is to train and coach people facing career and life transitions to overcome barriers, restore self-belief, and acquire the skills and tools needed to secure employment on a path to a living wage.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Philanthropy Network and the most unlike its peers is South Baltimore Community Land Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds United Workers Association Inc ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NO BOUNDARIES COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND PESTICIDE EDUCATION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND CONSUMER RIGHTS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds PARITY BALTIMORE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds JEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND CENTER ON ECONOMIC POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH EAST HOUSING INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS PERSONS REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Development Network of Maryland Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BALTIMORE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BAYBROOK ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds OUT For JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ALCOHOLISM & DRUG ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AS RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development Inc ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND CITIZENS' HEALTH INITIATIVE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Food Research & Action Center ↗
- Who funds PROGRESS NOW EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT OWN INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE GREEN SPACE ↗
- Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF MARYLAND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Zanvyl and Isabelle Krieger Fund Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Alliance for Open Society Int'L Inc · Foundation to Promote Open Society · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · Hopewell Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Fund for Change Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Maryland Family Network Inc — 66% of income from government
- Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc — 60% of income from government
- Parity Baltimore Incorporated — 11% of income from government
- South Baltimore Community Land Trust Inc — 11% of income from government
- Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service Inc — 7% of income from government
- Public Justice Center Inc — 5% of income from government
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Fund for Change Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Fund for Change Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.