Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Fred S Balsam Sr Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$127kCommunity Improvement$6kRecreation & Sports$5kCivil Rights$4kHuman Services$3kHealth$2kEducation$500International$235Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$550
Median grant
5
States reached
$301k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH$8,050
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES$8,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$550
ETHNOS 360$550
URBAN PROMISE$550
SALVATION ARMY$200
ALPHA PREGNANCY CENTER$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 29% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES: $8k → 9%HUEBNER DENTAL: $15k → 16%CENTRAL UNION MISSION: $200 → 14%SOUTHFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $500 → 8%CHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP: $500 → 15%CHRISTIAN WORKER FELLOWSHIP: $200 → 16%GIDEON BIBLE DISTRIBUTIONS: $200 → 14%MINISTRY ALLIANCE: $650 → 10%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $200 → 21%CHILDREN'S ORGAN TRANSPLANT ASSOC: $200 → 18%THE KATIE JOHNSON FELLOWSHIP: $200 → 9%URBAN PROMISE: $3k → 12%WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH: $31k → 6%ROCKVILLE PREGNANCY CLINIC: $400 → 8%SALEM CHILDREN'S TRUST: $200 → 18%CHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP: $500 → 15%MINISTRY ALLIANCE: $600 → 10%THE TULGEY WOOD: $200 → 9%URBAN PROMISE: $1k → 12%WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH: $30k → 6%ROCKVILLE WOMEM'S CENTER: $100 → 8%MARYLAND SALEM: $200 → 18%CHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP: $400 → 15%MINISTRY ALLIANCE: $600 → 10%URBAN PROMISE: $650 → 12%WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH: $7k → 6%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $600 → 8%CHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP: $200 → 15%MINISTRY ALLIANCE: $600 → 10%URBAN PROMISE: $600 → 12%WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH: $5k → 6%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $600 → 8%CHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP: $200 → 15%MINISTRY ALLIANCE: $550 → 10%URBAN PROMISE: $550 → 12%WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH: $10k → 6%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $600 → 8%MINISTRY ALLIANCE: $200 → 10%URBAN PROMISE: $500 → 12%WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH: $8k → 6%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $600 → 8%URBAN PROMISE: $350 → 12%WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH: $7k → 6%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $550 → 8%WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH: $5k → 6%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $550 → 8%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $550 → 8%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MI
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$138k · 12 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$138k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
-2%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
ReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalHealthHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    FRONTIER LABOURERS FOR CHRIST
    2× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue +35%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +120%
  • MA
    Ministry Alliance
    6× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -14%
  • SC
    SOUTHFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
2
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
3
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

5
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
6
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
7
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
8
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
9
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
10
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

11
Global Faith Network
Human Services
12
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes and the most unlike its peers is Katie Johnson Fellowship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCH — $102,950 · OtherWAKEFIELD VALLEY BIBLE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientURBAN PROMISE — $6,449 · Other+13 more — $10,200 · Other+13 moreFRONTIER LABOURERS FOR CHRIST — $11,000 · ReligionAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $500 · Religion+1 more — $200 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES INC — $8,000 · International+1 more — $35 · InternationalFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $4,550 · Youth DevelopmentMinistry Alliance — $3,200 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ALPHA PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $600 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $600 · HealthCENTRAL UNION MISSION — $600 · Housing & ShelterKATIE JOHNSON FELLOWSHIP INC — $200 · Civil Rights
Other$134,599Religion$11,700International$8,035Youth Development$7,750Health$1,200Housing & Shelter$600Civil Rights$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRONTIER LABOURERS FOR CHRIST — $11,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $4,550 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMinistry Alliance — $3,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALPHA PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL UNION MISSION — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND SALEM CHILDREN'S TRUST INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKATIE JOHNSON FELLOWSHIP INC — $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRONTIER LABOURERS FOR CHRIST
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds Ministry Alliance
  • Who funds THE ALPHA PREGNANCY CENTER INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL UNION MISSION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds MARYLAND SALEM CHILDREN'S TRUST INC
  • Who funds COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association
  • Who funds KATIE JOHNSON FELLOWSHIP INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Fred S Balsam Sr Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph