· Private foundation
The Fred Gellert Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k38 grants · $100k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PSEADS | $20,000 |
| MOUNTAIN PLAY ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| GREEN SCIENCE POLICY INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| RESOURCE RENEWAL INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| CLIMATE CENTER | $10,000 |
| FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE | $10,000 |
| VIVALON | $8,500 |
| EXTRAFOODORG | $6,000 |
| SUSTAINABLE CONSERVATION | $5,000 |
| OIL AND GAS ACTION NETWORK (CLIMATE HEALTH NOW) | $5,000 |
| ENRICHING LIVES THROUGH MUSIC | $5,000 |
| HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME | $5,000 |
| KQED INC | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD SHASTA-DIABLO INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GSGREEN SCIENCE POLICY INSTITUTE5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +8%
- RFREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +365%
- PPPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc4× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- CCCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUNDone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +11%
AS YOU SOWone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -31%
The Ocean Foundationone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
Bay Nature connects the people of the San Francisco Bay Area to our natural world and motivates people to solve problems with nature in mind. Our vision is that all people have a close relationship with theirnatural world.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…
Our mission is to protect local nature and farmland to ensure a healthy environment for everyone.
The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…
Our vision is a future where everyone benefits from a healthy San Francisco Bay, resilient to climate change and ringed by 100,000 acres of vibrant tidal marsh.
SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Ocean Voyages Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREEN SCIENCE POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds RESOURCE RENEWAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc ↗
- Who funds The Climate Center ↗
- Who funds Sustainable Conservation ↗
- Who funds MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds Vivalon ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PLAY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds Extrafood ↗
- Who funds Ocean Voyages Institute ↗
- Who funds HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME ↗
- Who funds Pseads ↗
- Who funds La Casa de las Madres ↗
- Who funds Baykeeper ↗
- Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
- Who funds Enriching Lives Through Music ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds SAFE & SOUND ↗
- Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Turning Green ↗
- Who funds 826 Valencia ↗
- Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
- Who funds ADOPT A FAMILY OF MARIN ↗
- Who funds Giant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Belvedere Tiburon Library Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds AS YOU SOW ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
- Who funds BY THE BAY HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Bothin Foundation · The Springcreek Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · The Feibusch Foundation · Harbor Point Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Fred Gellert Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Fred Gellert Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Fred Gellert Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.