Skip to content

Washington · Private foundation

The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
17
Grants FY2025
14
Organizations funded FY2024
36%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$12,846
Organizations funded a year
8 to 18
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$2.5M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 36% of the organizations The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 24% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionReligionCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving17$143k29%
FY202414$103k36%
FY202312$106k8%
FY202215$134k33%
FY202111$81k9%
FY202015$82k60%
FY201918$94k61%
FY20188$32k50%
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$143kYouth Development$92kHousing & Shelter$85kAnimals$80kReligion$70kEducation$67kFood & Nutrition$67kRecreation & Sports$60kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 21 grantees
All grantees of The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Yakima Humane Society$63,00081%
Pegasus Project Foundation$40,00042%
Childrens Wishes & Dreams$40,000513%
Wellness House$37,84652%
Love in the Name of Christ of Mason County$35,00067%
Yakima County Volunteer Attorney Services$30,00032%
Rod's House$30,00042%
Northwest Harvest Emm$25,00030%
Wellness Place$15,00024%
People for People$15,00020%
Yakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption Center$15,00021%
Tillamook High School$14,0002n/a
Sunrise Outreach Center of Yakima$11,00010%
Vision For Independence Center$5,00019%
Washington Council of the Blind$5,0001n/a
Parker Youth and Sports Foundation$5,0001n/a
Lighthouse Christian Ministries$5,00010%
Heartlinks$5,0001n/a
Highland Food Bank$2,0001n/a
Yakima Rotary Food Bank$2,00010%
United Paws of Tillamook$2,00021%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 30 recipients with no EIN on record ($401k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYakima Humane Society: $63,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPegasus Project Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetChildrens Wishes & Dreams: $40,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetWellness House: $37,846 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetLove in the Name of Christ of Mason County: $35,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetYakima County Volunteer Attorney Services: $30,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetRod's House: $30,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetNorthwest Harvest Emm: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWellness Place: $15,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetPeople for People: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption Center: $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSunrise Outreach Center of Yakima: $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVision For Independence Center: $5,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetLighthouse Christian Ministries: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYakima Rotary Food Bank: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Paws of Tillamook: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yakima Valley Community FoundationWA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · United Way of Central Washington · Northwest Harvest Emm · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation

How much does The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation give?
The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation reported 17 grants totaling $142,846 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 18 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (18%), Youth Development (11%), Housing & Shelter (11%).
Who are The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Yakima Humane Society ($63k), Pegasus Project Foundation ($40k), Childrens Wishes & Dreams ($40k).
Does The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 36% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Yakima Valley Community Foundation, United Way of Central Washington, Northwest Harvest Emm.
Where is The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation based?
The Fred C and Dolores R Williams Foundation is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred C and Dolores R Williams’ filings →

More from the funding graph