Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frank and Brenda Gallagher Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$138kHuman Services$44kHousing & Shelter$30kFood & Nutrition$26kArts & Culture$16kEducation$12kCivil Rights$7kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$573k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE HEALTH WAGON$4,000
CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC$4,000
WEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE$3,000
COMMUNITY MEALS INC$2,500
SEARCH (HOUSE OF TINY TREASURES)$2,500
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$2,000
CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION$1,500
RAMAPO BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COVENANT HOUSE NJ INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OASIS: $2k → 12%OASIS: $1k → 12%OASIS: $1k → 12%OASIS: $1k → 12%OASIS: $500 → 12%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $3k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $2k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $2k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $1k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $1k → 7%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $1k → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $1k → 7%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $500 → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $1k → 7%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $500 → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $1k → 7%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $500 → 7%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $500 → 7%CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $4k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 7%CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
VA
NC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$308k · 20 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$308k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+3%

Still filing today

75%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $113k · revenue +157%
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +145%
  • WB
    WEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • JY
    Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +3%
  • EVA'S VILLAGE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
2
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
3
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
6
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
7
Mercy Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
Newyork-Presbyterianbrooklyn Methodist

To provide excellent healthcare services without regard to age, sex, race, creed, national origin or disability; to serve as an educational and research center for physicians, nurses and healthcare professionals; to provide health…

—
9
Hmh Hospitals Corporation

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
10
Chs Services Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
12
Gotham Health Fqhc Inc

Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oasis - a Haven for Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York City Rescue Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $112,500 · HealthTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $14,000 · HealthST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC+1 more: $1,000 · HealthWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC: $24,500 · OtherWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INCCOMMUNITY MEALS INC: $18,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY MEALS INCSEARCH HOUSE OF TINY TREASURES: $17,000 · OtherSEARCH HOUSE OF TINY TREASURESHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $16,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYCOVENANT HOUSE NJ INC: $9,750 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE NJ INCNew York City Rescue Mission: $6,500 · OtherNew York City Rescue MissionIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+11 more: $14,500 · Other+11 moreCHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $37,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S AID AND …CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $11,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FOOD ACT…OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesOASIS - A HAVEN FOR…CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $6,000 · EducationUniversity of Houston Foundation: $5,000 · EducationSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $8,000 · Crime & LegalRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $5,250 · AnimalsMYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE: $250 · AnimalsEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Health$127,500Other$113,250Human Services$56,000Education$11,000Crime & Legal$8,000Animals$5,500Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $112,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $37,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC: $24,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEALS INC: $18,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $16,000 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $14,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $11,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNew York City Rescue Mission: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $5,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Houston Foundation: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREE THE KIDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds New York City Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds RAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Houston Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE THE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbia Bank FoundationNJ19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · American Express Foundation · Alfred N Sanzari Family Foundation Inc · Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · Mutual of America Foundation · Network for Good · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frank and Brenda Gallagher Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frank and Brenda Gallagher Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Center for Hope and Safety Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • West Bergen Mental Healthcare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Children's Aid and Family Services Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frank and Brenda Gallagher Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph