· Private foundation
The Frank and Brenda Gallagher Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE | $3,000 |
| COMMUNITY MEALS INC | $2,500 |
| CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES | $2,500 |
| SEARCH HOUSE OF TINY TREASURES | $2,000 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION | $1,500 |
| OASIS | $1,500 |
| COVENANT HOUSE NJ INC | $1,500 |
| EVA'S VILLAGE | $1,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $1,000 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER | $1,000 |
| THE HEALTH WAGON | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| RAMAPO BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TVTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $103k · revenue +157%
- CACHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +145%
- WBWEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- JYJuntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Incone grant, 2017 · $2k
- PPPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Incone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +3%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $750
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…
To provide excellent healthcare services without regard to age, sex, race, creed, national origin or disability; to serve as an educational and research center for physicians, nurses and healthcare professionals; to provide health…
We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oasis - a Haven for Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York City Rescue Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WEST BERGEN MENTAL HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds New York City Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds University of Houston Foundation ↗
- Who funds RAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc ↗
- Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc ↗
- Who funds FREE THE KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · American Express Foundation · Alfred N Sanzari Family Foundation Inc · Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · Mutual of America Foundation · Network for Good · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Frank and Brenda Gallagher Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Hope and Safety Inc — 69% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- West Bergen Mental Healthcare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Children's Aid and Family Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.