Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frangakis Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$231k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MReligion$274kFood & Nutrition$224kHuman Services$54kYouth Development$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kPhilanthropy$25kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$169k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THIEL COLLEGE$200,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$5,000
COMMUNITY EVENTS LLCWALK FOR WILLY'S WORLD$5,000
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF WEST MIDDLESEX$2,500
TOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK$2,500
MARYLAND FOOD BANK$2,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK MAHONING VALLEY$2,500
MERCER COMMUNITY FOOD WAREHOUSE$2,500
BANCO DE ALIMENTOS DE PUERTO RICO$2,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK CENTRAL FL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PHILLY KINDER$1,000
ALL SAINTS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ARC OF MERCER COUNTY: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OH
PA
WV
MD
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 25 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
16

Total granted

$1.7M
$331k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+153%

Still filing today

40%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyReligionHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THIEL COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +140%
  • TM
    THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +18%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SAINT NICHOLAS
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • GO
    GREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • FI
    FRENCH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest Food Bank of Nw Pa Inc

The mission of the second harvest food bank of northwest pennsylvania is to provide food to those in need within eleven counties of northwest pennsylvania while creating awareness and educating the community on the realities of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
God's Pantry Food Bank Inc

The mission of god's pantry food bank is reducing hunger by working together to feed kentucky communities. god's pantry food bank envisions a nourished life for every kentuckian.

—
5
Thurston County Food Bank

It is the mission of thruston county food bank to end hunger within our community.

Food & Nutrition
6
Pennsylvania Association of Regional Food Banks

To strengthen its partner organizations and maximize their potential, advocate for public policy that is favorable and increase food that is available to its partner organizations. hunger-free pennsylvania works to end hunger and food…

—
7
Food Bank of East Alabama Inc

To feed the needy

—
8
York County Food Bank

The mission of the york county food bank is to increase dignified access to nutritious food and community resources that enhance food security in york county.

—
9
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
10
German Valley Food Pantry
Food & Nutrition
11
Montgomery County Food Bank Inc

The mission of montogomery county food bank is "uniting the community" to fight hunger. the food bank is a nonprofit hunger relief organization that receives nutritious food and distributes to hungry children, seniors, veterans and…

—
12
Feeding Pennsylvania

Feeding pennsylvania is the partner state association of feeding america food banks. it is our mission to promote and aid our members in securing food and other resources to reduce hunger and food insecurity for their communities and…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Against Poverty Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THIEL COLLEGE: $1,298,333 · EducationTHIEL COLLEGE+1 more: $7,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF SAINT NICHOLAS: $150,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SAINT NICHOLASCOMMUNITY FOOD WAREHOUSE: $108,200 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD WAREHOUSEGREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF AMERICA: $100,000 · OtherGREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF AMERIC…MERCER COMMUNITY FOOD WAREHOUSE: $45,000 · OtherMERCER COMMUNITY FOOD WAREHOUSETOYS FOR TOTS: $45,000 · OtherTOYS FOR TOTSFRENCH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA: $40,000 · OtherFRENCH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF PHILA…EAR FOR YOU INC: $26,000 · Other+28 more: $145,470 · Other+28 moreWEIRTON UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropySECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBANCO DE ALIMENTOS PUERTO RICO INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $800 · HealthTHE ARC OF MERCER COUNTY: $500 · Human Services
Education$1,305,833Other$659,670Philanthropy$25,000Food & Nutrition$22,500Religion$15,000Health$800Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHIEL COLLEGE: $1,298,333 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetEAR FOR YOU INC: $26,000 over 2y, 42% of budgetWEIRTON UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLYKINDER: $7,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetWEIRTON CHRISTIAN CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUHL PARK CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBANCO DE ALIMENTOS PUERTO RICO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GERMAN SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $800 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THIEL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EAR FOR YOU INC ↗
  • Who funds WEIRTON UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PHILLYKINDER ↗
  • Who funds WEIRTON CHRISTIAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BUHL PARK CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BANCO DE ALIMENTOS PUERTO RICO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GERMAN SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF MERCER COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frangakis Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frangakis Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frangakis Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph