Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Foundation of the Family of Cm and Edna P Cotton

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$796k
Granted FY2022
26
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$159k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$286kEnvironment$240kFood & Nutrition$115kHuman Services$84kHousing & Shelter$66kYouth Development$61kHealth$41kInternational$25kOther$0
02FY2022 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $351k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $425k
$16,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOISE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$159,200
HERMAN PARK CONSERVANCY$100,300
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF OC$84,200
CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY$81,600
SHARE OUR SELVES$44,200
THE BEACON$27,050
MARINERS ELEM SCHOOL FDN$27,000
NEWPORT BEACH JUNIOR LIFEGUARDS FND$27,000
NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FNDTN$25,000
ALICE PJ WANG FOUNDATION$19,900
MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL$19,900
AFRICA SCHOOLS OF KENYA$19,400
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$16,000
NANTUCKET COMM SAILING PROGRAM$15,930
NEW HOPE HOUSING$15,920
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHARE OUR SELVES: $44k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $7k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $7k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $4k → 10%DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$369k · 11 repeat orgs$607k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$369k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+163%

Still filing today

55%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $589k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22
Human ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY
    3× · 2017–2022 · $109k · revenue +97%
  • Share Our Selves Corporation
    4× · 2017–2022 · $62k · revenue +63%
  • THE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON
    3× · 2018–2022 · $38k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • SA
    SCENIC AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +163%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • NB
    NEWPORT BEACH JR LIFEGUARDS
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
2
Southern California Streets Initiative

California Streets Initiative is a non-profit that practices solutions journalism at its five news websites listed above to educate inform and empower its readers.

Arts & Culture
3
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
4
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

—
5
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
6
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
7
San Francisco Architectural Heritage

The Organizations primary impact is to preserve and enhance San Franciscos unique architectural and cultural identity.

Arts & Culture
8
Children's Home Society of California

The mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.

Human Services
9
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
10
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
11
San Diego Society of Natural History

Conserving nature through science and discovery.

Arts & Culture
12
California Hotel & Lodging Association

CH&LA operate to protect the right and interest of the California lodging industry. Legislative advocacy, educational training, communication, and cost-savings programs are provided for all segments of the industry. In addition, CH&LA…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share Our Selves Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Reveal Nyc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOISE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $159,200 · OtherBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIONSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY: $109,100 · OtherSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCYNANTUCKET COMM SAILING PROGRAM: $33,930 · OtherNANTUCKET COMM SAILING PROGRAMMARINERS ELEM SCHOOL FDN: $33,000 · OtherMARINERS ELEM SCHOOL FDNSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $30,500 · OtherNEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FNDTN: $25,000 · OtherMATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORANGE: $19,900 · OtherALICE PJ WANG FOUNDATION: $19,900 · Other+17 more: $157,020 · Other+17 moreHermann Park Conservancy: $100,300 · EnvironmentHermann Park…SCENIC AMERICA: $7,500 · EnvironmentSCENIC AMERI…Share Our Selves Corporation: $62,200 · Human ServicesShare Our …AFRICA SCHOOLS OF KENYA: $19,400 · Human ServicesAFRICA SCH…DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $11,200 · Human ServicesDECORATIVE…SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $84,200 · Food & NutritionSECOND HA…NEWPORT BEACH JUNIOR LIFEGUARD FOUNDATION: $27,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON: $37,550 · HealthAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $23,100 · Animals
Other$587,550Environment$107,800Human Services$92,800Food & Nutrition$84,200Youth Development$43,000Health$37,550Animals$23,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY: $109,100 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHermann Park Conservancy: $100,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $84,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetShare Our Selves Corporation: $62,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON: $37,550 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEWPORT BEACH JUNIOR LIFEGUARD FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $23,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICA SCHOOLS OF KENYA: $19,400 over 1y, 30% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hope Housing Inc: $15,920 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEARNING LAB INC: $12,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetProject Hope Alliance: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY: $11,200 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMission Support Network: $7,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTeach Democracy: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH EMPLOYMENT SERVICE OF THE HARBOR AREA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Hermann Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Share Our Selves Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds NEWPORT BEACH JUNIOR LIFEGUARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AFRICA SCHOOLS OF KENYA ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds New Hope Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Hope Alliance ↗
  • Who funds DECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Mission Support Network ↗
  • Who funds SCENIC AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Teach Democracy ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMPLOYMENT SERVICE OF THE HARBOR AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds Reveal NYC Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Croul Family Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Foundation of the Family of Cm and Edna P Cotton funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Foundation of the Family of Cm and Edna P Cotton. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation of the Family of Cm and Edna P Cotton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph