Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Footprints Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$203k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$91k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$534kEducation$145kHealth$140kArts & Culture$74kHuman Services$67kFood & Nutrition$45kCommunity Improvement$6kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TECHFORCE FOUNDATION$91,200
MCPHERSON COLLEGE$50,000
RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$15,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO$10,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$5,000
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNVERSITY$5,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$5,000
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
SWAN SONGS$3,750
GLENBROOK NORTH HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%YMCA OF AUSTIN: $500 → 10%YMCA OF AUSTIN: $500 → 10%Coalition of Texans with Disabilities Inc: $2k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $12k → 10%SWAN SONGS: $11k → 10%Swan Songs: $10k → 10%LOAVES & FISHES: $10k → 7%SWAN SONGS: $4k → 10%LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 7%SWAN SONGS: $4k → 10%LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 7%SWAN SONGS: $3k → 10%LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 7%Swan Songs: $3k → 10%Loaves & Fishes Community Services: $5k → 7%CHRISTINE ALBERT SWAN SONGS INC: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IL
MI
MA
IN
AZ
KS
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$952k · 22 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
19

Total granted

$952k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+14%

Still filing today

55%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TECHFORCE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $518k · revenue +353%
  • MC
    MCPHERSON COLLEGE
    3× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +129%
  • SS
    Swan Songs Musical Last Wishes
    8× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • DF
    DOIT FROM THE HEART
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • FF
    FUND FOR MYELOMA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +743%
  • HE
    HAGERTY EDUCATION PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
4
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
5
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
6
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
9
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

—
10
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
College of American Pathologists Foundation

Champion humanitarian & patient-centered roles for pathologists. connect those in need to the specialized, life savings skills of pathologists. confer training & awards to residents.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Fund for Myeloma Education and Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TECHFORCE FOUNDATION: $518,400 · PhilanthropyTECHFORCE FOUNDATION+3 more: $15,164 · PhilanthropyMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $95,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERDOIT FROM THE HEART: $20,000 · OtherDOIT FROM THE HEARTTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $20,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD…RAVINIA: $17,000 · OtherRAVINIANORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · OtherNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSI…THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $11,000 · OtherHAGERTY EDUCATION PROGRAM: $10,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $10,000 · OtherTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Other+17 more: $37,520 · Other+17 moreSwan Songs Musical Last Wishes: $45,868 · Human ServicesSwan Songs…LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $45,000 · Human ServicesLOAVES & F…+2 more: $2,516 · Human ServicesMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $70,000 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · EducationRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $35,500 · Arts & CultureRPM FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,300 · Arts & CultureHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians: $10,500 · Membership BenefitFUND FOR MYELOMA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $350 · Health
Philanthropy$533,564Other$243,520Human Services$93,384Education$80,000Arts & Culture$56,800Membership Benefit$10,500Health$10,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTECHFORCE FOUNDATION: $518,400 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSwan Songs Musical Last Wishes: $45,868 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $35,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRPM FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians: $10,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,914 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Women of the World Inc: $5,800 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetDUPAGE PADS INC: $4,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT AUSTIN FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO: $1,042 over 1y, 0.0% of budget10-90 COPPERSTATE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AUSTIN: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CURE IT FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope Community Resources Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TECHFORCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCPHERSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Swan Songs Musical Last Wishes ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds RPM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Health Alliance for Austin Musicians ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR MYELOMA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Creative Women of the World Inc ↗
  • Who funds DUPAGE PADS INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION OF TEXANS WITH DISABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE ESPERANZA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT AUSTIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds 10-90 COPPERSTATE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St David's FoundationTX15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St David's Foundation · Better Business Bureau · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Footprints Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Footprints Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Footprints’ filings →

    More from the funding graph