Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Floyd and Barbara Warkol Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Education$278kHealth$43kPhilanthropy$10kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$5kInternational$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kReligion$1kOther$199k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$152k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROOKLYN TECH ALUMNI FOUNDATION$10,000
TEMPLE BETH EL OF BOCA RATON$5,000
YESHIVA OF SOUTH SHORE$5,000
LURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN$5,000
FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%SALEM COMMUNITY CORP: $2k → 11%MERRICK LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%MERRICK LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%PLACE OF HOPE: $1k → 11%MERICK LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$370k · 10 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
25

Total granted

$370k
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+15%

Still filing today

60%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    RILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +344%
  • ML
    MERRICK LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +18%
  • FS
    FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $1k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • BR
    BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDA
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • TC
    THE CITY COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue -69%
  • WP
    White Plains Hospital Medical Center
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
7
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
8
Nyu Langone Health System

The board adopted mission statement is: the corporation is operated exclusively for the benefit of nyu langone hospitals and its affiliated organizations. in this capacity, the corporation, may, in order to improve the health and welfare…

Health
9
Staten Island University Hospital

Staten island university hospital is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the…

Health
10
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
11
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

12
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fdny Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hearts in the Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCatholic Health SystemsJewish Education and Learni…Food Assistance ProgramsVolunteer Fire ServicesNyc K-12 Education & Enrich…Disease Research & Treatmen…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%4%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr20%26%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr11%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr20%9%20–35yr13%80%35–55yr11%5%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
9,601/81,320

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BROOKLYN TECH ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC — $269,321 · EducationBROOKLYN TECH ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $8,600 · EducationBOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDA — $100,000 · OtherBOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDAYESHIVA OF SOUTH SHORE — $29,957 · OtherYESHIVA OF SOUTH SHORETHE CITY COLLEGE FUND — $28,000 · OtherTHE CITY COLLEGE FUNDNY STEM CELL RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherNY STEM CELL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONTEMPLE BETH EL OF BOCA RATON — $10,000 · Other+14 more — $24,700 · Other+14 moreNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 · HealthWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center — $15,000 · HealthThe Marty Lyons Foundation Inc — $3,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthRILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $4,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureSALEM COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $2,000 · Human ServicesMERRICK LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesPLACE OF HOPE INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Soup Kitchen Inc — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$277,921Other$207,657Health$42,500Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$7,000Human Services$7,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROOKLYN TECH ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC — $269,321 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetTHE CITY COLLEGE FUND — $28,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLURIA ACADEMY OF BROOKLYN — $8,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Soup Kitchen Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marty Lyons Foundation Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFDNY FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALEM COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERRICK LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHelping Israel Fund — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTS IN THE COMMUNITY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Floyd and Barbara Warkol Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Salem Community Corporation7% of income from government
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc4% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph