Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Flow a Living Water Foundation

Support missionaries by granting funds to missionary-sending organizations and by creating a network for individual missionaries for communication and support.

$300k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$1.0MInternational$162kRecreation & Sports$126kEducation$95kCommunity Improvement$45kHuman Services$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $234k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$86k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION RESOURCE NETWORK$60,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
NORTH KOREAN REFUGEE MISSION$25,000
NEXT GENERATION FOR CHRIST$25,000
TEAM EXPANSION$18,000
THE EXPONENT GROUP$18,000
AMG INTERNATIONAL$15,000
UNDER THE SON MINISTRIES$14,400
CRESTVIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST$12,600
ATAWALE INTERNATIONAL MISSION$12,000
WEST ARK CHURCH OF CHRIST$12,000
PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY$12,000
LET'S START TALKING$10,000
CROATIA FOR CHRIST$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $174k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AGAPE ASIA: $35k → 15%NEXT GENERATION FOR CHRIST INC: $25k → 4%NEXT GENERATION FOR CHRIST: $28k → 6%AGAPE ASIA: $12k → 15%NEXT GENERATION FOR CHRIST INC: $24k → 4%NEXT GENERATION FOR CHRIST: $25k → 6%NEXT GENERATION FOR CHRIST INC: $24k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IN
CA
MO
KY
VA
AR
TN
SC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 41% of The Flow a Living Water Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 8% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 5%.

The Flow a Living Water Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 17 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$1.3M
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+13%

Still filing today

29%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NG
    Next Generation For Christ INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $127k · revenue +83%
  • MR
    MISSIONS RESOURCE NETWORK
    2× · 2023–2024 · $120k · revenue +43%
  • PU
    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • NK
    NORTH KOREAN REGUGEE SERVICES MISSION
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • MR
    MISSION RESOURCE NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • EP
    ELMER PALACIO WECARE
    one grant, 2023 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grace Global Ministries Inc

Grace Global Ministries exists to assist local churches in sending global workers to fulfill the Great Commission.

International
2
Chinese Christian Mission Inc

To reach out to the chinese worldwide in local evangelism and foreign missions. this purpose is facilitated through the use of missionaries, evangelism training and literature.

Religion
3
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
4
Going Beyond Missions

Train Gods people to live out a missionary lifestyle in their daily lives to obey the Great Commission. Build many mission teams and send the teams to UUPG Unreached Unengaged Peoples Group and make 10% of the world population disciples of…

Religion
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
6
Go With God Global

The organizations mission is enhancing the legal distribution of free bibles and equipping and discipling pastors and trainers to use the word of god effectively.

Religion
7
Global Missions Group

To facilitate (coordinate, organize and accompany) medical and other church mission trips to third world countries, specializing in partnering various churches in the us with foreign areas in need of assistance.

International
8
Great Commission Media Ministries-Usa

Non-denominational missions organization taking the gospel to russia, asia and middle east using television, radio and the internet. also ministering to churches throughout the united states.

Religion
9
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
10
Gospel Operation International for Chinese Christians

Our mission is to accomplish the Great Commission through the use of resources of Chinese churches worldwide in mission education, recruitment, training, missionary sending, and all other effective means in collaboration with the Global…

Religion
11
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
12
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amg International Inc; the most unlike its peers is North Korean Refugee Svc Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INC: $377,584 · OtherTEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INCCROATIA FOR CHRIST INC: $65,000 · OtherCROATIA FOR CHRIST INCIndividual grant recipient: $61,444 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTH KOREAN REFUGEE MISSION: $55,000 · OtherPOND SPRINGS CHURCH OF CHRIST: $54,000 · OtherNORTH KOREAN REFUGEE SVC MISSION: $48,000 · OtherEASTERN EUROPEAN MISSION: $46,837 · OtherTHE HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST: $36,800 · OtherCHRISTIAN MISSIONARY FELLOWSHIP: $36,200 · Other+18 more: $302,110 · Other+18 moreMISSIONS RESOURCE NETWORK: $120,000 · ReligionMISSIONS RESO…THE EXPONENT GROUP INC: $57,000 · ReligionTHE EXPONENT …Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated: $9,000 · ReligionNext Generation For Christ INC: $127,200 · Human ServicesNext Generat…CHINESE AGAPE FOUNDATION: $46,700 · Human ServicesCHINESE AGAP…PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $95,406 · EducationAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · International
Other$1,082,975Religion$186,000Human Services$173,900Education$95,406International$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNext Generation For Christ INC: $127,200 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetMISSIONS RESOURCE NETWORK: $120,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $95,406 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXPONENT GROUP INC: $57,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetCHINESE AGAPE FOUNDATION: $46,700 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal City Missions Initiative Incorporated: $9,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Next Generation For Christ INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONS RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE EXPONENT GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH KOREAN REFUGEE SVC MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE AGAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMG INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Flow a Living Water Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Flow a Living Water Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Flow a Living Water Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Flow a Living Water Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Flow a Living Water’s filings →

    More from the funding graph